RAMDHARI SAINI S/O SHRI BUDHRAM SAINI v. THE RAJASTHAN STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION
CW/18002/2025 · 2025-11-24
Ashok Kumar Jain
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 48775 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 48775 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:47724] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 18002/2025 Ramdhari Saini S/o Shri Budhram Saini, Aged About 56 Years, R/o Village Adarshnagar, Post Bagar, Distt. Jhunjhunu- 333023 (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus
1. The Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, Chomu House, Parivahan Marg, Jaipur Through Chairman Cum Managing, Director (Raj.)
2. The Executive Director (Admin), Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, Chomu House Jaipur (Rajasthan)
3. The Chief Manager, Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, Jhunjhunu Depot, Distt. Jhunjhunu (Raj.) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rohit Saini for Mr. Sunil Kumar Singodiya For Respondent(s) : Mr. Nitin Sinsinwar HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN
Order 24/11/2025
1. Instant writ petition is preferred by petitioner with following prayer:
“The impugned action of the respondents by which the petitioner has not been granted the benefit of selection scale /ACP from the due date may kindly be held as illegal and arbitrary and further the respondents be directed to grant the benefit of selection scale / ACP on completion of 9, 18 & 27 years of service, counting the length of service from the date of initial appointment and the respondents be also directed to calculate the
[2025:RJ-JP:47724] (2 of 3) [CW-18002/2025] arrears accrued thereof and be released with interest.”
2.
Learned counsel for petitioner while referring and relying upon judgment dated 20.08.2025 in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.10581/2023 titled as Dinesh Nawariya Vs. RSRTC and Anr. submits that the controversy and the issue raised herein is already settled by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court. He further submitted that instant writ petition be
disposed of in accordance with aforesaid order.
3. Mr. Nitin Sinsinwar, appearing on behalf of respondent accepts notice.
4. Having considered the submissions of learned counsel for petitioner and also material placed on record, the writ petition is disposed of in light of order dated 01.12.2021 in D.B. Special Appeal Writ No. 524/2018 titled as RSRTC & Anr. Vs. Tara Chand, later followed in case of Dinesh Nawariya Vs. RSRTC and Anr. (supra) by this Court.
5. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioner is given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents-Authority within a period of 30 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to decide the representation in light of ratio laid down in case of D.B. Special Appeal Writ No.524/2018 titled as RSRTC and Anr. Vs. Tara Chand (Decided at Principal Seat, Jodhpur) with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After passing the order, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the order to the petitioner either by way of
[2025:RJ-JP:47724] (3 of 3) [CW-18002/2025] speed post or through E-mail, if petitioner has provided E- mail in his representation. If the petitioner is still aggrieved, he has a liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition.
6. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of.
(ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J CHETNA BEHRANI/209