DEVIREDDY LAKSHMA REDDY v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
CRLP/4918/2025 · 2025-05-05
Harinath N
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 48775 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 48775 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI TUESDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 4918 OF 2025 Between:
1. Devireddy Lakshma Reddy (A-1), S/o. Venkateswara Reddy, Aged about 50 years, Occ Agriculture, R/o. Vedullapalli village, Bapatia Mandal, Bapatia District. 2. Oruganti Rohini (A2), W/o. Rajasekhar Reddy, Aged about 22 years, R/o. Vedullapalli village, Bapatia Mandal, Bapatia District. 3. . Oruganti Rajasekhar(A3), S/o. Venkateswara Reddy, Aged about 33 years, Occ Agriculture, R/o. Vedullapalli village, Bapatia Mandal, Bapatia District. 4. Gunimini Karuna Kumari(A4), W/o. Murali Krishna Reddy, Aged about 38 years, Occ House Wife, R/o. Vedullapalli village, Bapatia Mandal, Bapatia District. 5. Gunimini Vivekananda Reddy (A5), S/o. Murali Krishna Reddy, Aged about 45 years, Occ Agriculture, R/o. Vedullapalli village, Bapatia Mandal, Bapatia District. 6. Devireddy Subba Reddy (A6), S/o. Venkateswara Reddy, Aged about 50 years, Occ Agriculture, R/o. Kondamuru village, Bapatia Mandal, Bapatia District. ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.1-6 AND
1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Through the SHO- Uravakonda PS, Rep.by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh. ...RESPONDENT
./
2. Devireddy Ratnakumari, W/o. Lakshma Reddy, M Aged about 40 years, OccHouse Wife, R/o. Kondamuru village, J. Ponguluru, Bapatia Distric ...RESPONDENT/DEFACTO COMPLAINANT Petition under Section 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the proceedings pending in F.I.R.No.26 of 2025 of Vedullapalli Police Station, Bapatia District against the petitioners/Accused Nos. 1-6. I.A. NO: 2 OF 2025 Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay of all further proceedings pending in F.I.R. No. 26 of 2025 of Vedullapalli Police Station, Bapatia District against the petitioners/Accused Nos. 1-6. This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri KOTl REDDY IDAMAKANTI, Advocate for the Petitioner and the Public Prosecutor behalf of the Respondent No.1 and none appeared for the Respondent No.2.
on The Court made the following:
Jt IAPHC010231752025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] TUESDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 4918/2025 Between: Devireddy Lakshma Reddy and Others ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED(S) AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT{S) Counsel for the Petitioner/accused(S):
1.KOTI REDDY IDAMAKANTI Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S):
1.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Court made the following Order: \ \ Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor appearing for the State. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners and the respondent are relatives. The petitioner is the husband of the 2 respondent, and the 2"^ petitioner is the son of the 1®* petitioner and 2 respondent, and the other petitioners are also relatives of the 2^^ respondent. It is submitted that there are certain family disputes and on accoujat of the
2. nd nd
2 same, a false complaint is registered against the petitioners. Unmindful of the relationship between them, the police have referred the 2"'* respondent fon medical examination, and the wounds received by her are said to be grievous in nature. It is also submitted that the 2'"'^ respondent is in relationship with a third person and there was an altercation between the 2*^^ respondent and her living relationship. However, the petitioners are falsely implicated. 3. Considering the
submissions and the relationship between petitioners and the 2"^ respondent, the Station House Officer, Vedullapalli Police Station, Bapatia District, is directed to complete the investigation in Crime No. 26 of 2025, without taking any coercive steps against the petitioners. This shall not preclude the investigating officer from filing the charge sheet/final report. the
4. Accordingly, this Criminal Petition is disposed off. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.
SDI- V SAVITRI GOWRIi ASSISTANT^GISTRAR! IDNOFI^ER //TRUE COPY// SECT To,
1. The Station House Officer, Vedulapalli Police Station, Bapatia District.
2. One CC to SRI. KOTI REDDY IDAMAKANTI Advocate [OPUC]
3. Two CCs to PUBLIC PROSECUTOR [OUT]
4. Three CD Copies Pmg PRK
HIGH COURT DATED:06/35/2025
ORDER CRLP.No.4918 of 2025 2 5 JUL 2025 jg jS^JurrentSectiop^^^l^ DISPOSING THE CRLP