- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:41512 RSA No. 830 of 2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 830 OF 2019 (SP) BETWEEN: SRI. T.P.GANGAKUMAR, S/O. PUTTASHAMAIAH AGED ABOUT 77 YEARS, RESIDING AT LAKSHMI NILAYA, VENKATARAO COLONY, TUMKUR TOWN -572 101 TUMKUR DISTRICT. …APPELLANT (BY SRI. MANJUNATHA N., ADVOCATE [ABSENT]) AND: SMT. JAYAMMA, W/O. GANGAPPA, AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS, RESIDING AT NIDAVANDA VILLAGE, SOMPURA HOBLI, NELAMANGALA TALUK-562123 BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. CHANDRASHEKAR P. PATIL, ADVOCATE) THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL IS LISTED FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: Digitally signed by THEJAS KUMAR N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:41512 RSA No. 830 of 2019 ORAL ORDER When the case is called, the appellant is not represented. When the case is listed and called out, the advocate must be present. The absence may affect the case. As could be seen from the daily order sheet, the appeal was listed on 30.10.2024 and 26.04.2052. On those dates, there was no representation on behalf of the appellant. The appeal is listed today. As could be seen from the appeal papers, the appeal is filed in 2019. Now we are in October 2025. The appeal is pending from six years. As already noted above, when the case is called, the appellant is not represented. It appears that the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the appeal. Hence, the Regular Second Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. Because of dismissal of the appeal, pending interlocutory applications if any are disposed of and interim direction if any stands discharged. SD/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE TKN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 33