Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 48771 (ALL)

JAGMOHAN BHARTIYA v. STATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS

CRLP/8217/2025 · 2025-05-04

Mahesh Chandra Tripathi, Sandeep Chaudhary Joint Registrar Judicial

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:70825-DB Court No. - 42 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 8217 of 2025 Petitioner :- Jagmohan Bhartiya Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 6 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ulajhan Singh Bind Counsel for Respondent :- G.A. Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J. Hon'ble Anil Kumar-X,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned A.G.A. for the State- respondents and Shri Mahendra Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the informant. 2. This writ petition has been filed praying for the following reliefs: "i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing the Respondent police authorities to complete the investigation within a specific period/within a fix period fairly of First Information Report dated 28.02.2025 registered as Case Crime No.0036/2025 U/s 108, 351 (2) of B.N.S., 2023, Police Station-Bahariya, District-Prayagraj. ii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing the Respondent police authorities to take necessary legal action against the respondent no.4 to 7 for protection the life and liberty of the petitioner from respondent no.4 to 7 and decided the representation dated 09.04.2025 within specific period/within a fix period." 3. Shri G.P. Singh, learned A.G.A.-I, on instructions, states that during the course of investigation, the complicity of Sonu @ Ajeet Kumar Saroj has been found, and accordingly, the charge sheet has been forwarded to the competent court. It is also informed by the informant’s counsel that the other co-accused persons have preferred Criminal Misc. Writ Petition No. 5089 of 2025 (Rajendra Prasad and 2 Others vs. State of U.P. and 2 Others), in which a Division Bench has accorded interim relief till the submission of the police report, vide order dated 08.04.2025. 4. Considering the factual situation, and keeping in view that the other co-accused have already invoked writ jurisdiction and are inclined to cooperate with the ongoing investigation, we are of the opinion that the investigation must be conducted in a fair and expeditious manner. 5. With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition stands disposed of. Order Date :- 5.5.2025 NLY (Anil Kumar-X,J.) (Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J.) Digitally signed by :- NAND LAL YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad