CRWP-4274-2025 -1- 111 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-4274-2025 Date of Decision: 30.04.2025 Anjali and another ..... Petitioners Versus State of UT, Chandigarh and others .......Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BHARDWAJ Present: Mr. Pradeep Bhukal, Advocate, for the petitioners. Rajesh Bhardwaj, J. (ORAL) 1. The petitioners have filed the present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of direction to respondents No.2 and 3 not to harass the petitioners at the instance of respondent No.4 as the petitioners got to married with each other against the wishes of private respondent. Further prayer has been made to direct respondents No.2 and 3 to protect the lives and liberty of the petitioners. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners states that both the petitioners are major and have married against the wishes of respondent No.4. They apprehend danger from respondent No.4. Their marriage certificate evidencing their marriage is on record as Annexure P-3. The petitioners have submitted a representation dated 22.04.2025 (Annexure P- 4) to respondent No.2. 3. Notice of motion to the official respondents only. 4. Mr. Sumit Jain, Addl. PP, UT, Chandigarh accepts notice on behalf of the State. 5. Without entering upon an exercise to evaluate the evidentiary value of the documents placed on the file, I dispose of the petition with a SHARMILA DEVI 2025.04.30 19:19 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment PHHC CRWP-4274-2025 -2- direction to respondent no.2- the Senior Superintendent of Police, Chandigarh to decide the representation (Annexure P-4) of the petitioners and grant them protection, if any threat to their life and liberty is perceived. 6. It is clarified that this order shall not be taken to grant immunity to the petitioners from legal action for violation of law, if any, committed by them. This order would not be understood having expressed any opinion whatsoever by this Court on the validity of the marriage of the petitioners. (RAJESH BHARDWAJ) 30.04.2025 JUDGE sharmila Whether Speaking/Reasoned : Yes/No Whether Reportable : Yes/No SHARMILA DEVI 2025.04.30 19:19 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment PHHC