Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 4875 (AP)

Y SIVA SANKAR REDDY v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/2243/2025 · 2025-01-30

Gannamaneni Ramakrishna Prasad

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010038952025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3328] THURSDAY ,THE THIRTIETH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO: 2243/2025 Between: 1. Y SIVA SANKAR REDDY, S/O Y. JAYA CHANDRA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, OCC AGRICULTURE, R/O D.NO.2-31/2, REDDY AND REDDY COLONY, NEAR VINAYAKA SWAMY TEMPLE, TIRUPATI ROAD, PILER MANDAL, ANNAMAIAH DISTRICT 2. K. RAMANAIAH, S/O LATE K. PEDDABBA, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, OCC AGRICULTURE, R/O MAJARA KURAVAPALLI H/O GUDAREVUPALLI, FILER MANDAL, ANNAMAIAH DISTRICT 3. R. BABU, S/O LATE R. BABA IQBAL, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, OCC AGRICULTURE, R/O MAJARA MORAWADDIPALLI H/O BODUMALLUVARIPALLI, PILER MANDAL, ANNAMAIAH DISTRICT 4. B. VENKATRAMANA, S/O B. CHINNASWAMY, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, OCC AGRICULTURE, R/O MAJARA MORAWADDIPALLI H/O BODUMALLUVARIPALLI, PILER MANDAL, ANNAMAIAH DISTRICT 5. B. BHARGAVI, W/O Y. SIVA SANKAR REDDY, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, OCC HOUSE WIFE, R/O D.NO.1- 416/4, SAINIK NAGAR, KADAPA ROAD, PILER VILLAGE AND MANDAL, ANNAMAIAH DISTRICT 6. N. SAI ABHIRAM REDDY, S/O N. SREENIVASULU REDDY, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, OCC AGRICULTURE, R/O 1-1, SIVARAMAPURAM, DODDIPALLE, PILER MANDAL, ANNAMAIAH DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) 2 AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE (L.A) DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ANNAMAIAH DISTRICT AT RAYACHOTY 3. THE SUB COLLECTOR CUM LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, MADANAPALLE, ANNAMAIAH DISTRICT 4. THE TAHSILDAR, PILER MANDAL, ANNAMAIAH DISTRICT 5. THE NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY OF INDIA, REP., BY ITS PROJECT DIRECTOR, MINISTRY OF ROAD TRANSPORT AND HIGHWAYS, PIU, TIRUPATI, TIRUPATI DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. SURESH KUMAR REDDY KALAVA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR LAND ACQUISITION 2. GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: ORAL ORDER: Heard Sri P.Anand Surya, Ld. Counsel appearing on behalf of Sri Suresh Kumar Reddy Kalava, Ld. Counsel for the Writ Petitioners, Sri K. Arjun Chowdary, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue and Land Acquisition, Stamps & 3 Registration and Sri Akhil Krishna, Ld. Counsel appearing on behalf of Sri S.S.Varma, Ld. Counsel for Respondent No.5/NHAI. 2. The Ld. Counsel appearing for Respondent No.5 submits that the Representation dated 30.12.2024 (Ex.P1), submitted by the Writ Petitioners, is under consideration. 3. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of this case, this Court deems it appropriate to dispose of this Writ Petition at the admission stage, without going into the merits, by directing Respondent No.5 to consider the Representation, dated 30.12.2024 (Ex.P1) submitted by the Writ Petitioners and pass a Speaking Order in accordance with the law within a period of two (02) weeks from today, and furnish a copy of such Order to the Writ Petitioners forthwith. The Writ Petitioners are directed to submit a copy of this Order along with photocopy of the Representation to Respondent No.5 within one week from today, for effective compliance. Since Respondent No.5 is already represented by counsel, submission of the Order may not be necessary. The same may be considered on merits. 4. With these observations and directions, this Writ Petition is allowed. No order as to costs. 4 5. Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this order. ___________________________ G. RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD, J Dt: 30.01.2025. S D P 5 167 THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION No. 2243 OF 2025 30.01.2025 W S D P