Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 48749 (PNJ)

RENU THAKKAR AND OTHERS v. AIRCEL LTD AND ANOTHER

ARB/256/2025 · 2025-08-05

Jagmohan Bansal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 251 ARB-256-2025 Date of Decision: 05.08.2025 Renu Thakkar and others …Applicants Versus Aircel Limited and another …Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL Present: - Mr. Saksham Mahajan, Advocate for the applicants Mr. Nakul Gandhi, Advocate for the respondents (through video conferencing) *** JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (Oral) 1. Learned counsel for the respondents, at the outset, submits that as per arbitration agreement, venue of arbitration is Delhi and all the disputes are subject to jurisdiction of Delhi Courts. 2. Faced with this, learned counsel for the applicant seeks permission to withdraw the present application with liberty to approach Court of competent jurisdiction. 3. Dismissed as withdrawn with aforesaid liberty. (JAGMOHAN BANSAL) JUDGE 05.08.2025 Mohit Kumar Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No MOHIT KUMAR 2025.08.05 16:23 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.