Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:65306 Court No. - 69 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 3209 of 2025 Applicant :- Ajit Kumar And Another Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Dhirendra Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Vivek Varma,J. 1. Copy of the statement of the doctor and the statement of the victim under Section 183 B.N.S.S. produced by the learned A.G.A. are taken on record. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicants and Sri V.P. Tripathi, learned A.G.A. for the State- opposite party, and perused the material placed on record. 3. This application has been filed seeking anticipatory bail in Case Crime No. 295 of 2024, under Sections 74, 109, 115(2), 351(2), 352 B.N.S., Police Station Alinagar, District Chandauli. 4. Learned counsel for the applicants submits that the applicants were not named in the first information report and have been falsely implicated in the instant case. As per the allegations in the first information report, named accused Pintu Bind and 2-3 unknown persons are alleged to have assaulted the informant, his son and another person. As per the medical report of son of the informant Shubham Jaiswal, he received injuries which were found simple in nature. The other injured also received injuries which were found simple in nature. The nature of the injuries shows that there was no intent to murder. In the statement of the victim under Section 183 B.N.S.S., specific role of assault on the head of Shubham Jaiswal has been assigned to accused Pintu Bind. Co-accused Pintu Bind has been granted regular bail by the Sessions Judge, Chandauli vide order dated 18.03.2025 passed in Bail Application No. 306 of 2025. At this stage there is no credible evidence to link the applicant with the offence. The applicants have no criminal antecedents. It is next submitted that the investigation is going on and the applicants have apprehension of their arrest in the above mentioned case. 5. Learned A.G.A. and learned counsel for the informant opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail but could not satisfactorily dispute the aforesaid submissions from the record. 6. Learned counsel for the applicants further submits that the application for grant of anticipatory bail be confined only till the submission of police report. 7. Having regard to the submissions made by learned counsel for the applicants, considering the nature of accusations and antecedents of the applicants and, in particular, the fact that the applicants were not named in the first information report; as per the medical report, the injured received injuries which were found simple in nature; in the statement of the victim under Section 183 B.N.S.S., specific role of assault on the head of Shubham Jaiswal has been assigned to accused Pintu Bind; at this stage there is no substantive evidence to link the applicant with the offence; co- accused Pintu Bind has been granted regular bail by the Sessions Judge, Chandauli; without commenting on merits of the case, I am of the opinion that the applicants are entitled to be enlarged on anticipatory bail till the submission of police report. 8. In the event of arrest, the applicants- Ajit Kumar and Ashish Pratap Sahni be released on anticipatory bail in the aforesaid case crime till the submission of police report, if any, under Section 193 (3) B.N.S.S., on furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 50,000/- with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Station House Officer of the police station concerned with the following conditions:- (i) The applicants shall make themselves available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required; (ii) The applicants shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer; (iii) The applicants shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court and if they have passport, the same shall be deposited by them before the S.S.P./S.P. concerned. 9. In default of any of the conditions, the Investigating Officer is at liberty to file appropriate application for cancellation of anticipatory bail granted to the applicants. 10. The Investigating Officer is directed to conclude the investigation of the present case in accordance with law expeditiously preferably within a period of three months from the date of production of a copy of this order independently without being prejudiced by any observation made by this Court while considering and deciding the present anticipatory bail application of the applicants. 11. The applicants are directed to produce a copy of this order before the S.S.P./S.P. concerned within ten days from today, who shall ensure the compliance of present order. 12. The application stands disposed of. Order Date :- 28.4.2025 SKT/- Digitally signed by :- SHIVA KANT TIWARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad