Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 48743 (ALL)

X- MINOR v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

CRLR/4994/2023 · 2025-03-03

Samit Gopal

Criminal Appealbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:30739 Court No. - 78 Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 4994 of 2023 Revisionist :- X- Minor Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Revisionist :- Ashok Kumar Singh,Dhirendra Kumar Srivastava,Kumar Dhananjay Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Rajesh Mishra Hon'ble Samit Gopal,J. 1. List revised. 2. The present revision has been filed by the revisionist before this court with the following prayer :- "It is therefore most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may graciously be pleased call the record of Juvenile Criminal Appeal No. 115 of 2023, 'Child in Conflict with Law 'X' Vs. State of U.P.' and set aside the judgement /order dated 18.08.2023 passed by learned Children's Court/Additional Sessions Judge (POCSO Act), Court No. 3, Ghaziabad, while deciding the Criminal Appeal No. 115 of 2023, 'Child in Conflict with Law 'X' Vs. State of U.P.' as well as the order dated 15.06.2023 in Bail Application No. 47 of 2023, arising out of Case Crime No. 1099 of 2022, U/s 147, 302, 506, 34 of IPC, registered at Police Station- Vijay Nagar, Ghaziabad. The Hon'ble Court may further be pleased to release the revisionist on bail in connection with Case Crime No. 1099 of 2022, U/s 147, 302, 506, 34 of IPC, registered at Police Station- Vijay Nagar, Ghaziabad, during the pendency of trial/proceeding before the court below or Juvenile Justice Board, Ghaziabad. And/or pass any other and further order which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper under the facts and circumstances of the case, otherwise revisionist shall suffer irreparable loss and injury which cannot be compensate in any way." 3. No one appears on behalf of the revsionist to press the prayer for bail in the present revision, despite the fact that there are three learned counsels appearing for the revisionist. 4. Sri Rajesh Mishra, learned counsel for the opposite party no.2 is also not present. 5. Sri Ram Prakash Shukla, learned counsel for the State is present. 6. Since there is no representation even in the revised list on behalf of the revisionist to press the prayer for bail. Despite of the three learned counsels appearing in the matter to press the prayer for bail. The present revision is dismissed as not pressed. 7. The matter is consigned to records. (Samit Gopal,J.) Order Date :- 4.3.2025 Abhishek Sri. Digitally signed by :- ABHISHEK RANJAN SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad