Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 48729 (AP)

S. Penchalaiah v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/35069/2018 · 2025-08-17

B V L N Chakravarthi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010724852018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] MONDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 35069/2018 Between: 1. S. PENCHALAIAH, S/O. NARASIMHULU, AGE- 42 YEARS, OCC- FIELD ASSISTANT (UNDER SUSPENSION), R/ O. YELLAMRAJUPALLI VILLAGE, NALLATHIMAIAHPALLI GRAM PANCHAYAT, ADEPUR POST, NANDULURU MANDAL, Y.S.R DISTRICT - 516 150. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, PANCHAYAT RAJ DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE PROJECT DIRECTOR/PRIMARY AUTHORITY, DISTRICT WATER MANAGEMENT AGENCY, Y.S.R DISTRICT AT KADAPA. 3. THE MANDAL PARISHAT DEVELOPMENT OFFICER/ PROGRAMME OFFICER, MGNREGS, NANDALURU MANDAL, Y.S.R DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction 2 more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring proceedings issued by 2nd respondent in RC No.HR/Nandaluru (Mandal)/2018, dt.01.09.2018 as illegal, arbitrary, contrary to service conditions and contrary to law laid down by this Hon'ble Court and consequently direct the respondents 2 85 3 to continue the petitioner as Field Assistant under MGNREG Scheme to Nallathimmayapalli Gram Panchayat, Nandaluru Mandal, Y.S.R District, with all consequential and incidental benefits attached to the post and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the proceedings issued by 2nd respondent in RC No.HR/ Nandaluru (Mandal)/2018, dt.01.09.2018, pending disposal of the Writ Petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. P V V SATYANARAYANA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEV (AP) 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 35069 of 2018 The Court made the following Order: This Court after perusing the earlier proceedings gave a direction on 24.07.2025, to list the matter under the caption 8For Dismissal9. However, today also, there is no representation for the petitioner. 2. Learned Standing Counsel for respondent No.3 would submit that basing on the interim Order dated 01.10.2018 passed by this Court, the petitioner was reinstated into the service and therefore, the cause in the present Writ Petition has become infructuous. 3. Recording the submission made by learned Standing Counsel for respondent No.3, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. Interlocutory applications, if any, pending shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI Dated: 18.08.2025 PSA 4 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 35069 of 2018 Date: 18.08.2025 PSA