Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 48728 (ALL)

KALICHARAN AND 4 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

WRIB/1577/2025 · 2025-09-14

Ajay Bhanot

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - B No. - 1577 of 2025 Court No. - 50 HON'BLE AJAY BHANOT, J. Civil Misc. Impleadment Application Heard Shri Amit Saxena, learned counsel for the applicant. The impleadment application is dismissed. Order in writ petition Learned Standing Counsel submits that the petitioners have made a prayer for a mandamus upon the respondent no. 4 to make over possession of the plot allotted to the petitioner. The Uttar Pradesh Consolidation of Holdings Act is a self contained Code and the procedure for execution of orders passed by the authorities is laid out therein. The petitioners have an alternative remedy under the UPCH Act. Faced with this Shri R.P. Mishra, learned counsel assisted by Ms. Ranjana, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners may be granted leave to avail their alternative remedies as per law. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Prem Prakash Yadav, Ram Kishor Gupta, Ranjana, Shiv Shankar Gupta Counsel for Respondent(s) : Amit Saxena, C.S.C. Kalicharan And 4 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) It shall always be open to the petitioners to raise their grievance before the appropriate forum. The writ petition is disposed of. September 15, 2025 Vandit WRIB No. 1577 of 2025 2 (Ajay Bhanot,J.) Digitally signed by :- VANDIT AGRAWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad