239 1. SUNIL ESTATE OFFICER /CHIEF EXECUTIVE PT B.D. SHARMA AND ANR. 2. SOMBIR ESTATE OFFICER /CHIEF EXECUTIVE PT B.D. SHARMA AND ANR. 3. SAI SHARAN ESTATE OFFICER /CHIEF EXECUTIVE PT B.D. SHARMA AND ANR. CORAM: Present: HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI, J. (Oral) 1. which are mentioned in the heading involve common question of law in the context of common set of facts and thus they are being decided by a common order. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision : 13 CWP VERSUS ESTATE OFFICER /CHIEF EXECUTIVE PT B.D. SHARMA AND CWP SOMBIR VERSUS ESTATE OFFICER /CHIEF EXECUTIVE PT B.D. SHARMA AND CWP SAI SHARAN VERSUS ESTATE OFFICER /CHIEF EXECUTIVE PT B.D. SHARMA AND CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI Ms. Nirmala Jangra, Advocat e for Mr. Deepak Girotra, Advocate for the peti Mr. Naman Jain, Advocate for the respondents. HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI, J. (Oral) Present are the bunch of three which are mentioned in the heading involve common question of law in the context of common set of facts and thus they are being decided by a common order. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision : 13-05-2025 CWP-1556-2022 (O&M) ........Petitioner VERSUS ESTATE OFFICER /CHIEF EXECUTIVE PT B.D. SHARMA AND ........Respondent(s) CWP-1600-2022 (O&M) ........Petitioner VERSUS ESTATE OFFICER /CHIEF EXECUTIVE PT B.D. SHARMA AND ........Respondent(s) CWP-1612-2022 (O&M) ........Petitioner VERSUS ESTATE OFFICER /CHIEF EXECUTIVE PT B.D. SHARMA AND ........Respondent(s) HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI Nirmala Jangra, Advocat e for Advocate for the petitioner(s). Naman Jain, Advocate for the respondents. HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI, J. (Oral) three writ petitions, the details of which are mentioned in the heading involve common question of law in the context of common set of facts and thus they are being decided by a ESTATE OFFICER /CHIEF EXECUTIVE PT B.D. SHARMA AND ESTATE OFFICER /CHIEF EXECUTIVE PT B.D. SHARMA AND ESTATE OFFICER /CHIEF EXECUTIVE PT B.D. SHARMA AND HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI writ petitions, the details of which are mentioned in the heading involve common question of law in the context of common set of facts and thus they are being decided by a SAPNA GOYAL 2025.05.13 16:24 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-1556-2022 (O&M) and other connected cases -2- 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that issue raised in the present bunch of petitions has already been considered by this Court while passing order in CWP No.20272 of 2023 titled “Nannu Ram Vs. National Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research, S.A.S Nagar, Mohali and ors.”, along with the bunch of cases decided on 03.02.2025, wherein the similar award passed, has been set aside and the cases have been remanded back to the Labour Court for fresh adjudication. 2. Learned counsel for the respondents does not raise any objection in case the present bunch of petitions are disposed of in terms of CWP No.20272 of 2023 titled “Nannu Ram Vs. National Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research, S.A.S Nagar, Mohali and ors.” decided on 03.02.2025. 3. Keeping in view the agreement between the parties, the present bunch of petitions are also disposed of in terms of CWP No.20272 of 2023 titled “Nannu Ram Vs. National Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research, S.A.S Nagar, Mohali and ors.”, decided on 03.02.2025. 4. The parties are directed to appear before the Labour Court on 03.07.2025. 5. Pending application, if any, also stands disposed of. 6. Photocopy of this order be placed on the files of other connected cases. 13-05-2025 Sapna Goyal (HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI) JUDGE NOTE: Whether speaking: YES Whether reportable: NO SAPNA GOYAL 2025.05.13 16:24 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document