Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 48722 (PAT)

Lorik Das v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./40655/2025 · 2025-08-13

Prabhat Kumar Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.40655 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-390 Year-2022 Thana- BAGHA District- West Champaran ====================================================== 1. Lorik Das son of Late Bhukhal Das village- Khora Parasa, Ps- Bagaha, Dist- West champaran 2. Raghaw Das @ Raghaw Prasad Das son of Late Bhukhal Das village- Khora Parasa, Ps- Bagaha, Dist- West champaran 3. Sangita Devi wife of Lorik Das village- Khora Parasa, Ps- Bagaha, Dist- West champaran 4. Pooja Kumari Daughter of Lorik Das village- Khora Parasa, Ps- Bagaha, Dist- West champaran ... ... Petitioners Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Prithvi Nath Mishra, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Vinod Shanker Modi, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 3 13-08-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. 2. Petitioners apprehend arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 341, 323, 379, 354, 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code. 3. As per the prosecution case, when the informant was constructing house under PM Awas Scheme, all the FIR named accused persons including these petitioners came there and assaulted informant and her family members with lathi, danda. Accused persons demanded Rs.2 lacs as extortion money and also tried to outrage modesty of informant. They took away gold ornaments, clothes and cash Rs.50,000/- from her house. Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.40655 of 2025(3) dt.13-08-2025 2/2 4. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioners that parties are pattidar and it was informant who was constructing the house on the land of these petitioners and when it was protested, a simple marpit took place between them in which both sides sustained injuries. There is case and counter case. Doctor has found simple injury. Petitioners claim clean antecedent. 5. Considering the aforesaid facts of the case, prayer for bail of all the petitioners is allowed. In the event of arrest/surrender within eight weeks from today, let these petitioners, mentioned above, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate I, Bagaha, West Champaran in Bagaha Police Station Case No. 390 of 2022, subject to the conditions laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Shashi (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) U T