Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 48719 (RAJ)

CHIEF ENGINEER, RAJASTHAN STATE AGRICULTURE MARKETING BOARD v. M/S BALAJI STEEL INDUSTRIES

SAW/1329/2025 · 2025-11-24

Maneesh Sharma, Sanjeev Prakash Sharma

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:47420-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Special Appeal (Writ) No. 1329/2025 In S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.9408/2025 1. Chief Engineer, Rajasthan State Agriculture Marketing Board, Pant Krishi Bhawan, Janpath, Jaipur. 2. Superintending Engineer, Rajasthan State Agriculture Marketing Board, Kisan Bhawan, Lal Kothi, Tonk Road, Jaipur. 3. Superintending Engineer, Rajasthan State Agriculture Marketing Board, Kisan Bhawan, Deeg-Kumher Road, Circle-Bhartpur. ----Appellants/Respondent Versus 1. M/s Balaji Steel Industries, Having Its Office At 52/118, Sector-5, Pratap Nagar, Sanganer, Jaipur, Rajasthan, Through Its Power Of Attorney Holder Mr. Rakesh Kumar Mishra. -----Non-Appellant/Petitioner 2. State of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Department of Agriculture, Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan- 302005. 3. State of Rajasthan, Through Additional Chief Secretary, Agriculture, Department, Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan- 302005. 4. Chief Engineer, Public Works Department, Wing-A, PWD Head Office, 170, Kamla Nehru Nagar, Ganpati Nagar, Jaipur, Rajasthan 302007. ----Non-Appellant/Performa-Respondents For Appellant(s) : Mr. R.A. Katta For Respondent(s) : Mr. Aman Lodha Mr. Pranav Pareek HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE MR. SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANEESH SHARMA Order [2025:RJ-JP:47420-DB] (2 of 2) [SAW-1329/2025] 24/11/2025 1. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellants has invited our attention to a Notification dated 06.11.2020, whereby, he states that an amendment was made exercising the powers under sub-section (1) of Section 9 of the Rajasthan Stamp Act, 1998 and the schedule was changed upto Rupees Fifty Lakhs. The stamp duty was fixed as Rupees One Thousand. 2. Learned counsel submits that the said notification has not been looked into by the learned Single Judge. 3. We notice that the notification placed before us is not the Gazette Notification but the initial notice sent to the Superintendent, Government Central Press, Jaipur for notifying in the Gazette in Part 4(c). 4. Be that as it may, if there is any factual error, it is for the learned Single Judge to examine the same. We, therefore, refrain from entertaining this appeal and leave it open for the appellants to move an appropriate review petition. 5. The present Special Appeal (Writ) is, accordingly, dismissed at this stage with liberty to file a review petition. 6. All pending applications stand disposed of. (MANEESH SHARMA),J (SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA),ACTING CJ AMIT/13