Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 48718 (AP)

VALLURI NARESH KUMAR v. THE STATE OF AP

WP/8505/2020 · 2025-09-16

B Krishna Mohan

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010141372020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3233] WEDNESDAY,THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN WRIT PETITION NO: 8505/2020 Between: 1. VALLURI NARESH KUMAR, FATHER NAME S/O SUBBA RAO, AGED ABOUT 49, R/O.NELATURU, KAPILESWARAPURAM MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY REVENUE( LAND ACQUISITION) DEPARTMENT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT AT KAKINADA. 3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, CUM- LAO, RAMACHANDRAPURAM, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 4. THE TAHSILDAR, KAPILESWARARAM PURAM MANDAL, KAPILESWARARAMPURAM, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. T V S PRABHAKARA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR LAND ACQUISITION (AP) The Court made the following: 2 Order: Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for the respondents. 2. This writ petition was filed questioning the action of the respondents in issuing the Notification dated 05.03.2020 proposing to acquire the land to an extent of Ac.2.60 cents in Sy.No.153/4, 155/1 of Nelaturu Village, Kapileswarapuram Mandal, East Godavari District. 3. On the other hand, the learned Assistant Government Pleader relying upon the written instructions of the 4th respondent submits that the District Collector, East Godavari, Kakinada, issued withdrawal notification of the subject lands mentioned in the Writ Petition under Section 93(1) of LA & RR Act, 2013, vide D.Dis/G4/RCPM/KPM/Nelaturu/497/2019, dated nil/03/2021, as alternative lands were identified for the purpose of providing house sites under <Navaratnalu-Pedalandari Illu=. 4. Since, the subject land is not used for the said purpose and in view of the said submissions of the learned Assistant Government Pleader, made through the written instructions of the 4th respondent dated 06.08.2025, no further orders are necessary in this writ petition. The copy of the said instructions of the 4th respondent shall be made as part of the Court record. 3 5. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of. Interim order, if any, deemed to have been vacated. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Miscellaneous Petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________ JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN 17.09.2025 PNS