SUNITA SINGH D/O CHHOTU SINGH v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CW/18598/2023 · 2025-10-30
Ashok Kumar Jain
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 48716 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 48716 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:43541] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 18598/2023
1. Sunita Singh D/o Chhotu Singh, Aged About 33 Years, R/o Katrathal, Sikar, Rajasthan.
2. Devendra Kumar S/o Dinesh Kumar Sharma, Aged About 34 Years, R/o Ward No. 19, Mahanto Ki Kothi, Kanwarpura Road, Sikar, Rajasthan.
3. Rajesh Kumar Ghasil S/o Rajendra Singh Ghasil, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Village Das Ki Dhani, Tehsil And District Sikar, Rajasthan.
4. Neelam Sharma D/o Kailash Chandra Atreya, Aged About 41 Years, R/o 9/115, Vidhyadhar Nagar, Jaipur, Rajasthan.
5. Maya Kumari D/o Mahendra Singh, Aged About 40 Years, R/o 798, Adarsh Colony, Ward No.9, Neem Ka Thana, District Neem Ka Thana.
6. Rakhi Agarwal D/o Suresh Kumar Agarwal, Aged About 34 Years, R/o Ward No. 16, Mohalla Ballupura, Tehsil Khandela, District Sikar, Rajasthan. ----Petitioners Versus
1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Secretary, Department Of Education, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur.
2. The Director, Secondary Education, Rajasthan, Bikaner.
3. The Education Officer, Secondary Education, Headquarter, Sikar.
4. The District Education Officer, Secondary Education, Head Quarter, Neem Ka Thana.
5. The District Education Officer, Secondary Education, Headquarter, Churu. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ram Pratap Saini For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manoj Sharma, AAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN
[2025:RJ-JP:43541] (2 of 3) [CW-18598/2023]
Order 30/10/2025
1. This writ petition is filed by the petitioners with following prayers.:- i. Respondents may kindly be directed to conduct counseling for the post of Teacher Gr. III Level 2 Subject Hindi in Mahatma Gandhi English Medium Schools in compliance of advertisement and thereby give posting to the petitioners on the post of Teacher Gr. III Level II Hindi as per the marks secured by them on a vacant posts of Hindi Subject. ii. Impugned action of the respondents may kindly be declared illegal by which they are not conducting counselling for the post of Teacher Gr. III Level II Subject Hindi for Mahatma Gandhi English Medium Schools or in alternate give posting to the petitioners against the post of Sr. Teacher Subject Hindi in the Mahatma Gandhi Govt. Schools, Sikar similar to the candidates of Teacher Gr. III Level II SST.
2.
Learned counsel for petitioners while referring judgment dated 20.10.2023 in case of Vikram Singh and Anr. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.: S.B. Civil Writ No.16275/2023 and connected matters submitted that clause in the order of appointment restricting the reliving of the petitioner(s) was quashed and set aside. He further submits that the judgment is approved by Hon’ble Division Bench on 05.03.2024 in D.B. Special Appeal Writ No.53/2024. He further submits that the writ petition be disposed of in accordance with judgment in case of Vikram Singh & Anr. Vs. State of Rajasthan (supra).
[2025:RJ-JP:43541] (3 of 3) [CW-18598/2023]
3. Mr. Manoj Sharma, AAG accepts notice on behalf of respondents and office is directed to reflect the name of Mr. Manoj Sharma, AAG as counsel for respondents.
4. Mr. Manoj Sharma, AAG submits that the judgment in case of Vikram Singh & Anr. Vs. State of Rajasthan (supra) has attained finality and same has been implemented by the respondents. He submits that if the judgment is applicable on
facts and circumstances of the case then the writ be disposed accordingly.
5. Having considered submission of learned counsel for the parties and also considering the material as placed on record, the writ petition preferred by petitioners is disposed of in terms of
order dated 20.10.2023 in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.16275/2023 Vikram Singh & Anr. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. The clause in appointment order placing a restriction to relieve the petitioners is hereby quashed and set aside.
6. The respondents are directed to relieve the petitioners from their present position and permit them to join at the place(s), where they have been provided appointment by orders as mentioned in petition.
7. The instant writ petition and misc. application(s), if any, stands disposed of.
(ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J GAURAV /211