1 APHC010506132016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 38683 OF 2016 Between: 1. Appalakonda, S/o.Satyam, Aged about 47 years, Occ: Attender, R/o.Pendurthi Village and Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. ...Petitioner AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Higher Education Department, State Secretariat at Velagapudi, Amaravathi. 2. The Commissioner of Intermediate Education, State of Andhra Pradesh, Nampally, Hyderabad. 3. The Regional Joint Collector, Higher Education Department, State of Andhra Pradesh, at Rajahmundry, East Godavari District. 4. The Correspondent, S.V.L.N.S.V.P.Junior College, Gopalapuram, Visakhapatnam. ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction, more preferably in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the inaction on the part of the 2nd 2 respondent in not considering the representations of the petitioner, latest being dated 27th December, 2015 to ratify the appointment of the petitioner as Attender as illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional being violative of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and also violative of principles of natural justice and doctrine of legitimate expectation and consequently direct the 2nd respondent to ratify the appointment of the petitioner as attender in the 4th respondent college, while setting aside the proceedings in D.Dis.No.Admn.I-B-2/26636/2012, dated 17.07.2013, in the interest of justice and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: PARAVASTU KRISHNA Counsel for the Respondent: GP FOR EDUCATION (AP) Counsel for the Respondent: P.K.RAMESH Counsel for the Respondent: GP FOR HIGHER EDUCATION (AP) The Court made the following order: 3 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION No.38683 of 2016 ORDER: The instant writ petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking the following main relief: <to issue a writ, order or direction, more preferably in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the inaction on the part of the 2nd respondent in not considering the representations of the petitioner, latest being dated 27th December, 2015 to ratify the appointment of the petitioner as Attender as illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional being violative of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and also violative of principles of natural justice and doctrine of legitimate expectation and consequently direct the 2nd respondent to ratify the appointment of the petitioner as attender in the 4th respondent college, while setting aside the proceedings in D.Dis.No.Admn.I-B-2/26636/2012, dated 17.07.2013, in the interest of justice and to pass..…..= 2. On 07.08.2025, no representation for the petitioner. Today also though the matter is listed under the caption of 8dismissal9, there is no representation for the petitioner. It seems that the petitioner is not evincing any interest to prosecute the matter. 3. In the circumstances, the writ petition is dismissed for default. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ______________________________ MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM, J Date: 14.08.2025 Rns 4 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION No.38683 of 2016 Date:14.08.2025 Rns