[2025:RJ-JP:43792] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 11657/2025 Sushil Kumar Murjani S/o Shri T.d. Murjani, Aged About 55 Years, R/o 24, Gopal Badi, Modal Town, Jagatpura, Jaipur (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Urban Development And Housing Department, Government Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. Secretary, Jaipur Development Authority, Jaipur. 3. Patel Nagar Grah Nirman Sahkari Samiti Limited, Through Secretary, Office Address C-18, Gayatri Nagar Vistar, Maharani Farm, Durgapura, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sanjay Joshi, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. V.D. Gathala, AGC with Ms. Poonam Rao, Adv. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR Order 01/11/2025 1. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayer:- "It is, therefore, humbly prayed that your Lordship may graciously be pleased to accept and allowed this writ petition of the petitioner and after summoning the entire record pertaining to this case, further pleased to direct :- i. Direct the respondent no.2 approved and regularized the plots no.329-B measuring 233.33 Sq. Yards and 329-C measuring 200 Sq. Yards situated at Kusum Vihar Residential Scheme developed by the respondent no.3 belongs to the petitioner. [2025:RJ-JP:43792] (2 of 3) [CW-11657/2025] ii. Any other appropriate order or direction which this Hon'ble Court may consider just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case may also kindly be passed in favour of the humble petitioner." 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been allotted Plot Nos.329-B and 329-C under 'Kusum Vihar Residential Scheme', Jagatpura and the said scheme has been approved by JDA. However, during course of regularization of the said scheme, plots belonging to the petitioner have not been regularized by JDA. Learned counsel also submits that the matter is pending before the respondent Nos.1 and 2 for last more than 5 years. 3. Learned counsel prays that the present petition be disposed of at this stage, with liberty to the petitioner to file appropriate representation before the respondent Nos.1 and 2 and the respondent Nos.1 and 2 be directed to decide the said representation, if any filed by the petitioner, in a time bound manner. 4. Mr. V.D. Gathala, learned AGC accepts notices on behalf of the respondent Nos.1 and 2 and submits that he has no objection if the petition is disposed of with the aforesaid direction. 5. In view of the aforesaid discussions, this petition is disposed of with the liberty to the petitioner to file appropriate representation before the respondent Nos.1 and 2 within a period of one month from the date of passing of this order and the respondent Nos.1 and 2 are directed to decide the representation, if any filed by the petitioner, after giving proper opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, in an expeditious manner. [2025:RJ-JP:43792] (3 of 3) [CW-11657/2025] 6. Stay application and any other pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. (ASHUTOSH KUMAR),J AARZOO ARORA /09