Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 487 (UTT)

GULSHAN KUMAR CHANDHOK v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPMS/3562/2025 · 2026-01-09

Rakesh Thapliyal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS WPMS No. 3562 of 2025 Hon’ble Rakesh Thapliyal, J. 1. Mr. Amar Murti Shukla, learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. Mr. Ganesh Kandpal, learned Deputy Advocate General with Mr. Tarun Mohan, learned Brief Holder for the State. 3. Mr. Vipul Sharma, learned counsel for the SIDCUL/ respondents no. 2 and 3. 4. Mr. Nikhil Singhal, learned counsel for the respondent no. 4. 5. By the instant writ petition, petitioner is praying for the following relief: “i. To issue a writ order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the respondents to quash and set aside the letter dated 08.12.2025 and issue new provisional transfer letter for a new proposed buyer either online or manual, thereby enabling the petitioner to get provisional transfer permission in respect of the plot no. 232/C, Sector 7, Industrial Area IIE, SIDCUL, Haridwar. ii. To issue a writ or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the respondents to adjust the amount of Rs. 5,00,000/- as processing fees at the time of issuing new provisional transfer letter because the previous transfer could not mature.” 6. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner may be given liberty to move a fresh representation before the General Manager, SIDCUL within ten days for redressal of his grievances. 7. In such view of the matter a liberty is given to the petitioner to move a representation to the General Manager for redressal of his grievances. 8. If such a representation is moved, the General Manager, SIDCUL shall decide the same by reasoned and speaking order by giving personal hearing to the petitioner within a period of one month from the date of production of certified copy of this order. 9. With the above direction, the writ petition is finally disposed of. (Rakesh Thapliyal, J.) 09.01.2026 SKS