MANBHARI DEVI AND ORS v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ANR
CRLMP/6647/2015 · 2025-11-27
Anil Kumar Upman
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 48691 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 48691 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:48172] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 6647/2015
1. Manbhari Devi wife of Hanuman Sahay, resident of 26, Pal Colony, Mali Ki Kothi, Bagarana, Jaipur, Police Station, Kanota (Raj.).
2. Seema wife of Suresh Kumar, resident of 26, Pal Colony, Mali Ki Kothi, Bagarana, Jaipur, Police Station, Kanota (Raj.).
3. Kishan Lal son of Hanuman Sahay, 26, Pal Colony, Mali Ki Kothi, Bagarana, Jaipur, Police Station, Kanota (Raj.)
4. Mukesh Jat son of Kaluram, resident of Pal Colony, Mali Ki Kothi, Bagarana, Jaipur, Police Station, Kanota (Raj.)
5. Chandra Prakash son of Ramphool, resident of 350, Mali Ki Kothi, Bagarana, Agra Road, Jaipur, Police Station, Kanota (Raj.)
6. Jagdish son of Kalyan, resident of 33-34, Pal Colony, Mali Ki Kothi, Bagarana, Jaipur, Police Station, Kanota (Raj.)
7. Bholuram son of Mangalram, resident of Pal Colony, Mali Ki Kothi, Bagarana, Jaipur, Police Station, Kanota (Raj.) ----Accused Petitioners Versus
1. State of Rajasthan through the learned Public Prosecutor ----Respondent
2. Nisha Gaur wife of Shri Rajnish Gaur, resident of Ekta Nagar, Bagarana, Jaipur, Police Station, Kanota and C-282, J.D.A. Colony, Paldi Meena, Agra Road, Jaipur, Police Station, Kho-Nagoriyan (Raj.). ---Complainant-Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Dipty Jindal for Mr. Amit Jindal For Respondent(s) : Mr. M.S. Shekhawat, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN
Order 27/11/2025
Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw this criminal misc. petition with liberty to file appropriate
[2025:RJ-JP:48172] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-6647/2015] application before the learned trial Court as parties have resolved their dispute amicably. Permission sought for is granted. Accordingly, this criminal misc. petition is dismissed as withdrawn liberty as prayed. Stay application and pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of.
(ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J LALIT MOHAN /22