Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 48690 (PNJ)

SEEMA RANI AND OTHERS v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

CRM-M/21838/2025 · 2025-05-23

Harpreet Singh Brar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

269 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-21838-2025 Date of decision: 23.05.2025 Seema Rani and others ....Petitioners Versus State of Haryana and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARPREET SINGH BRAR Present: Mr. Dinesh Sharma, Advocate for the petitioners. (through V.C.) Mr. Harkesh Kumar, AAG, Haryana. Mr. Nikhil Mittal, Advocate for respondents No.2 to 5.(through V.C.) HARPREET SINGH BRAR, J. (ORAL) 1. This petition has been filed under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking quashing of FIR No.119 dated 05.04.2025 under Sections 115(2)/190/191(3)/305/324(4)/329(3)/331(4)/333/ 351(2)/62 of BNS registered at Police Station Bilaspur District Yamuna Nagar (Annexure P-1) along with all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of compromise dated 19.04.2025 (Annexure P-2). 2. The following order was passed on 25.04.2025: “This petition has been filed under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking quashing of FIR No.119 dated 05.04.2025 under Sections 115(2)/190/191(3)/305/324(4)/329(3)/331(4)/333/351(2)/62 of BNS registered at Police Station Bilaspur District Yamuna Nagar (Annexure P-1) along with all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of compromise dated 19.04.2025 (Annexure P- 2). Notice of motion for 23.05.2025. At this stage, on the asking of the Court, Mr. Vikas Bhardwaj, AAG, Haryana accepts notice on behalf of respondent No.1-State and Mr. Nikhil Mittal, Advocate accepts notice for respondents No.2 to 5 and files his vakalatnama and admits to the factum of compromise. Copy of the paper book be supplied to them during the course of day. Service is complete. Neha 2025.05.26 18:07 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-21838-2025 -2- In the meanwhile, the parties are directed to appear before the learned trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate within two weeks from today or any other date convenient to the trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate, to get their statements recorded regarding compromise and after recording their statements, learned trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate is directed to send report regarding the genuineness of compromise and also to intimate whether any PO proceedings are pending against any of the party on or before the date fixed. A copy of the order be sent to learned trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate through fax for compliance. ” 3. In compliance of the aforesaid order, a report has been received from the concerned jurisdictional Court that the compromise between the parties is genuine and arrived at without any pressure or coercion from anyone. 4. In view of the compromise and the ratio of law laid down by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Narinder Singh and others vs. State of Punjab and another, (2014) 6 SCC 466 and Shakuntala Sawhney (Mrs) Vs. Kaushalya (Mrs.) and others (1980) 1 SCC 63 and Full Bench of this Court in Kulwinder Singh Vs. State of Punjab 2007 (3) RCR (Crl.) 1052, this petition is allowed and FIR No.119 dated 05.04.2025 under Sections 115(2)/190/191(3)/305/324(4)/329(3)/331(4)/333/ 351(2)/62 of BNS registered at Police Station Bilaspur District Yamuna Nagar (Annexure P-1) along with all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom are quashed, qua the petitioners. (HARPREET SINGH BRAR) JUDGE 23.05.2025 Neha Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No Neha 2025.05.26 18:07 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document