1 HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR FA No. 139 of 2010 1 - Chhannu Lal Thakur S/o Sukhram, R/o Bhaghmara, Tahsil Balod ,district- Durg ... appellant(s) versus 1 – Punaram, S/o Motiram, by caste gaur, R/o Village- Salfa, Tahsil- Pathariya, Dist- Bilaspur. 2- State of Chhattisgarh through Collector Bilaspur ... Respondent(s) Order on Board 26/11/2025 Ms. Renu Kochar, learned counsel for the appellant. Mr. Amishan Hussain, learned counsel for Respondent No. 1. Mr. Arvind Dubey, Govt. Advocate for the Respondent/ SAGRIKA AGRAWAL Digitally signed by SAGRIKA AGRAWAL Date: 2025.11.27 11:56:42 +0530 2 sagrika State. Learned counsel for the appellant would submit that in the SPC was issued, it was reported in the service report of SPC that the sole appellant Chhannu Lal Thakur has died on 20.01.2018. On 29.07.2025, when the matter was taken up for hearing, 04 weeks time is granted to the learned counsel for the appellant to move appropriate application for substitution of his LRs, however, despite her efforts, the LRs of the deceased/ appellant could not made any contact with her and therefore, she could not file any appropriate application for substitution of his LRs. She would also submit the she has no instruction from the LRs of the deceased/ appellant. Considering the submissions made by learned counsel for the appellant and also considering that the sole appellant Chhannu Lal Thakur has died on 20.01.2018 and no application for substitution of his LRs has been filed, the present first appeal is abated. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge