APHC010181242020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3233] TUESDAY,THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN WRIT PETITION NO: 11587/2020 Between: 1. MURRA NARAYANA REDDY,, S/O. CHINNA BALI REDDY, AGED 30 YEARS, R/O DOOR NO 1/83, P. BOMMENEPALLI VILLAGE, JAMMALAMADUGU MANDAL, Y.S.R KADAPA DISTRICT. 2. MURRA BALANAGI REDDY,, S/O. M. CHINA BALI REDDY, AGED 30 YEARS, R/O P. BOMMENEPALLI VILLAGE, JAMMALAMADUGU MANDAL, Y.S.R KADAPA DISTRICT. 3. UPPULURI PULLA REDDY,, S/O. GURIVI REDDY, AGED 65 YEARS, R/O AMBAVARAM VILLAGE MANDAL, JAMMALAMADUGU MANDAL, Y.S.R KADAPA DISTRICT. 4. KORRU ARUNA KUMAR, W/O K.PADMANABHA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 18 YEARS, R/O D.NO. 2-33, P. BOMMENEPALLI VILLAGE, JAMMALAMADUGU MANDAL, Y.S.R KADAPA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, THULLUR MANDAL, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, Y.S.R KADAPA DISTRICT, KADAPA. 3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, JAMMALAMADUGU, Y.S.R KADAPA DISTRICT. 2 4. THE TAHSILDAR, JAMMALAMADUGU MANDAL, Y.S.R KADAPA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. JAMI MADHAVI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: 3 Order: Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for the respondents. 2. This writ petition was filed questioning the action of the respondent authorities in taking steps to assign the road adjacent to the land, which is used for ingress and egress to the agricultural lands of the petitioners in Sy.No.20, to an extent of Ac. cents, situated at P. Bommenepalli Village, Jammalamadugu Mandal, Y.S.R. Kadapa District, in the name of allotting house sites under the Navaratnalu Program, without giving any notice and without following due process of law. 3. On the other hand, the learned Assistant Government Pleader, relying upon the counter of the 4th respondent, submits that the subject land is assessed waste land, a B.T. Road already exists, and there is no proposal for allotting the same for house sites. 4. In view of the same, no further orders are necessary in this writ petition. 5. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. Interim orders, if any, stands vacated. As a sequel, Miscellaneous Petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________ JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN 23.09.2025 PNS 4