Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 48682 (MAD)

PALANISAMY v. SANTHAMANI DIED

AS/765/2019 · 2025-07-25

R Sakthivel

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

A.S. NO.765 OF 2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 25.07.2025 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.SAKTHIVEL Appeal Suit No.765 OF 2019 and CMP.Nos.8459, 8463 & 8467 of 2023 1. Palanisamy 2. Kumar ... Appellants / Plaintiffs Vs. Santhamani (Died) 1. Karpagam 2. Vijayan @ Ponnusamy 3. Saraswathy 4. Jayalakshmi 5. Shanmugam 6. Kandasamy Nanjappan (died) 7. Selvam @ Selvaraj 8. Balamani 9. Murugesan 10. Premalatha 11. Subramani 12. Kumar 13. Shanthamani 14. Suganthi 15. Kalaivani 16. Suguna 17. Poongodi 18. Revathi ... Respondents / Defendants Page No.1 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis A.S. NO.765 OF 2019 PRAYER : This Appeal Suit filed under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure 1908, read with Order XVLI Rule 1 of CPC, praying to set aside the Judgment and Decree dated November 30, 2018 made in O.S.No.700 of 2009 passed by the III Additional District and Sessions Judge, Coimbatore. For Appellants : Mr. Jeyakumar For R1 : Mr.Gopalakrishnan for M/s.B.Kumarasamy For R4 & R5 : Mr.Siddharath Sridhar for M/s.R.Bharath Kumar For R6 to R8, 13 to 18 : Mr.R.Praveen for M/s.GK.Muthukumar J U D G M E N T Mr. Jeyakumar, learned counsel on record for the appellants, Mr.Gopalakrishnan, representing Mr.B.Kumarasamy, learned counsel on record for the first respondent, Mr.Siddharath Sridhar, representing Mr.R.Bharath Kumar, learned counsel on record for the respondent Nos.4 & 5 and Mr.R.Praveen, representing Mr.GK.Muthukumar, learned counsel on record for the respondent Nos.6 to 8, 13 to 18 are before this Court. Page No.2 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis A.S. NO.765 OF 2019 2. The learned counsel for the appellant seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this appeal suit and he has filed a memo dated July 14, 2025 to that effect. The said memo is recorded. 3. In view of the memo, the appeal suit is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently, connected civil miscellaneous petitions are closed. 25.07.2025 Index : Yes/No Speaking order : Yes/No Neutral Case Citation : Yes/No av To The III Additional District and Sessions Judge, Coimbatore. R.SAKTHIVEL, J. Page No.3 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis A.S. NO.765 OF 2019 av Appeal Suit No.765 OF 2019 Appeal Suit No.840 OF 2019Appeal Suit No.840 OF 2019 2021CMA NOS.423 AND 828 OF 2021 CMA NOS.423 AND 828 OF 2021 25.07.2025 Page No.4 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis