HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 7012/2025 Dayaram Son Of Shri Ganpatram, Resident Of Santhalka, Police Station Bhiwadi Phase-3, Tehsil Tijara, District Alwar (Raj). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, through Public Prosecutor. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Raj Kumar Kasana For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Punia, PP JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 01/11/2025 1. By way of filing this criminal misc. petition, a prayer has been made for issuing directions to the Trial Court to decide the pending criminal case expeditiously, within a time frame, preferably within a period of one month. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that an FIR was registered by the complainant-petitioner in the year 2020 and after investigation, the charge-sheet was submitted and thereafter, the statements of the witnesses were recorded and after investigation, the final report negative was submitted against which a protest petition was filed by the petitioner and statements of the complainant-petitioner have been recorded under Section 200 Cr.P.C. Counsel submits that till date, no orders of cognizance has been passed, hence, appropriate directions be issued. (2 of 2) [CRLMP-7012/2025] 3. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, the direction sought for, cannot be granted in favour of the petitioner in the light of the judgment passed by the Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of A.R. Antulay vs. R.S. Nayak and Anr. reported in 1992(1) SCC 225 and in the case of P. Rama Chandra Rao. Vs. State of Karnataka reported in 2022 (4) SCC 578, but looking to the fact that the case is posted for arguments on cognizance since long, hence it is expected from the Trial Court to pass an appropriate order expeditiously, as early as possible. 4. With the aforesaid observations/directions, the instant criminal misc. petition stands disposed of. The stay application and all pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J KuD/57