Research › Search › Judgment
Bombay High Court · body
2025 DAILYLAW 48659 (BOM)
LAXMAN S/O TUKARAM DURGE v. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH PSO, PS PACHPAOLI, NAGPUR AND OTHERS
WP/295/2025 · 2025-04-03
Shri Nitin W Sambre, Vrushali V Joshi
body2025
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 48659 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 48659 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 102.wp.295.25 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 295/2025 Laxman s/o. Tukaram Durge Vs. State of Maharashtra and Ors. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Ms R. M. Mishra, Advocate for Petitioner. Mr. S. M. Ghodeswar, A.P.P. for Respondent/State.
CORAM : NITIN W. SAMBRE AND MRS.VRUSHALI V. JOSHI, JJ.
DATED : 03/04/2025.
1. Heard.
2. The petition is not pressed, as such it is
disposed of with liberty to take recourse to such steps as are permissible and advisable in law.
(MRS. VRUSHALI V. JOSHI, J.) (NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.) RGurnule 2025:BHC-NAG:3433-DB