Smt. Raj Kumari Pandey v. Smt. Urmila Bai And Anr.
SA/343/2015 · 2025-11-10
Shri Rakesh Mohan Pandey
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 48658 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 48658 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 / 2
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR SA No. 343 of 2015 Smt. Raj Kumari Pandey versus Smt. Urmila Bai And Anr. Order Sheet 11/11/2025 Shri Rahul Jha, Advocate for respondent No.1. Shri Pramod Shrivastava, Dy.G.A. for the State/ respondent No.2. Shri Anurag Agrawal, Advocate would submit that the sole appellant has died during the pendency of the present appeal and the registered letter was sent but it returned unserved. Heard. Taking into consideration the submissions made by Shri Anurag Agrawal, as a last opportunity, two weeks’ time is granted to take appropriate steps failing which, the appeal shall stand dismissed without further reference to the Bench. NIRMALA RAO
2 / 2 If the order passed by this Court is complied with, the matter shall be listed for final hearing on 2.12.2025. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge Nimmi