- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:51945-DB COMAP No. 551 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA COMMERCIAL APPEAL NO. 551 OF 2025 BETWEEN: 1. M/S. MAFATLAL INDUSTRIES LTD A COMPANY REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR HDIL - KALEDONIA BUILDING 6TH FLOOR, OFFICE NO. 3 SAHAR ROAD, ANDHERI (EAST) MUMBAI - 400 069 REPRESENTED BY AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVES SRI DILIP ACHARYA S/O RAMANLAL AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS ALSO AT: A COMPANY REGISTERED UNDER THE INDIAN COMPANIES ACT, 1956 HAVING THEIR REGISTRATION OFFICE AT NO.130/302 HERITAGE HORIZON, 3RD FLOOR OFF: G.C. ROAD, NAVRANGPURA AHMEDABAD - 380 009 ALSO AT: A CORPORATE OFFICE AT MAFATLAL HOUSE 5TH FLOOR, H.T. PAREKH MARG BACKBAY, RECLAMATION Digitally signed by AMBIKA H B Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:51945-DB COMAP No. 551 of 2025 CHURCHGATE MUMBAI - 20 …APPELLANT (BY SRI V. SRINIVAS, ADVOCATE FOR SRI H.M. MADHUSUDHANA, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SRI. PRASAN DUGAR S/O SOHANLAL DUGAR AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS PROPRIETOR OF M/S. KEYSTONE APPEARLS ADD: 141-2-1, 3RD CROSS PIPELINE WEST KASTURI BA NAGAR MYSORE ROAD BENGALURU - 560 026 REPRESENTED BY HIS MANAGER AND GPA HOLDER AMITJAIN S/O BHAWARLAL JAIN AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS …RESPONDENT THIS COMMERCIAL APPEAL IS FILD UNDER SECTION 13(1A) OF THE COMMERCIAL COURTS ACT, 2015 PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE PASSED IN THE COM.OS NO.236/2021 DATED 09.08.2021 ON THE FILE OF THE LXXXVIII ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, (EXCLUSIVE COMMERCIAL COURT) BENGALURU CITY (CCH-89) AND ALLOW THE APPEAL FILED BY THE APPELLANT AND CONSEQUENTLY DISMISS THE SUIT OF THE RESPLENDENT. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:51945-DB COMAP No. 551 of 2025 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU, CHIEF JUSTICE and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: HON'BLE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU, CHIEF JUSTICE) 1. The learned counsel appearing for the appellant seeks to withdraw the present appeal. He states that the parties have since settled their disputes before the executing court. 2. The appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. The court fee be refunded to the appellant in accordance with the rules. 3. The pending interlocutory applications also stand disposed of. Sd/- (VIBHU BAKHRU) CHIEF JUSTICE Sd/- (C.M. POONACHA) JUDGE AHB List No.: 1 Sl No.: 6