Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 48654 (PNJ)

JASVINDER v. STATE OF HARYANA

CRM-M/21384/2025 · 2025-05-29

Manisha Batra

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 111 JASVINDER STATE OF HARYANA CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. Present : Mr Mr. Apoorv Garg, Sr. D.A.G., Haryana MANISHA BATRA CRM-22625-2025 This application has been filed for preponement of the date of hearing which is fixed for 16.07.2025. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that he has filed another application bearing No.CRM main petition as the petitioner does not want to pursue the same. Learned State counsel has no objection if the present application is allowed. Accordingly, the application is allowed and date of hearing of the main petition is preponed to today and the same is t Court today itself. CRM-22626-2025 This application has been filed by the petitioner seeking permission to withdraw the main petition by submitting that the petitioner does not want to pursue the same. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-22625 CRM-M Date of decision: Versus STATE OF HARYANA HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA Mr. Manvinder Singh Dalal, Advocate for the Mr. Apoorv Garg, Sr. D.A.G., Haryana **** MANISHA BATRA, J. (oral) 2025 This application has been filed for preponement of the date of hearing which is fixed for 16.07.2025. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that he has filed another application bearing No.CRM-22626-2025 seeking withdrawal of the on as the petitioner does not want to pursue the same. Learned State counsel has no objection if the present application Accordingly, the application is allowed and date of hearing of the main petition is preponed to today and the same is t Court today itself. 2025 This application has been filed by the petitioner seeking permission to withdraw the main petition by submitting that the petitioner does not want to pursue the same. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 22625-2025 in/and M No.21384 of 2025 (O&M) Date of decision: 29.05.2025 …. Petitioner …. Respondent MANISHA BATRA , Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Apoorv Garg, Sr. D.A.G., Haryana. This application has been filed for preponement of the date of Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that he has filed 2025 seeking withdrawal of the on as the petitioner does not want to pursue the same. Learned State counsel has no objection if the present application Accordingly, the application is allowed and date of hearing of the main petition is preponed to today and the same is taken on the Board of this This application has been filed by the petitioner seeking permission to withdraw the main petition by submitting that the petitioner does This application has been filed for preponement of the date of Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that he has filed 2025 seeking withdrawal of the Learned State counsel has no objection if the present application Accordingly, the application is allowed and date of hearing of the aken on the Board of this This application has been filed by the petitioner seeking permission to withdraw the main petition by submitting that the petitioner does Jyoti 2025.05.29 19:42 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM Learned State Counsel submitted that the petitioner is abusing process of law as the bail application of co-accused has been dismissed by learned trial Court by observing that the application of other co In view of prayer made by the petitioner, the application is allowed. Main case In view of above, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn. 29.05.2025 Jyoti-IV CRM-M No.21384 of 2025 (O&M) Learned State Counsel who has appeared on advance notice, has submitted that the petitioner is abusing process of law as the bail application of accused has been dismissed by learned trial Court by observing that the application of other co-accused is pending before this Cou In view of prayer made by the petitioner, the application is In view of above, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn. (MANISHA BATRA) Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No. Whether reportable : Yes/No (O&M) -2- who has appeared on advance notice, has submitted that the petitioner is abusing process of law as the bail application of accused has been dismissed by learned trial Court by observing that the accused is pending before this Court. In view of prayer made by the petitioner, the application is In view of above, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn. (MANISHA BATRA) JUDGE Yes/No. Yes/No who has appeared on advance notice, has submitted that the petitioner is abusing process of law as the bail application of accused has been dismissed by learned trial Court by observing that the In view of prayer made by the petitioner, the application is Jyoti 2025.05.29 19:42 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document