Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 48654 (ALL)

LUKMAN CHAUHAN v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

WRIC/12969/2025 · 2025-05-12

Shekhar B Saraf, Y K Srivastava

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:77713-DB Court No. - 40 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 12969 of 2025 Petitioner :- Lukman Chauhan Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Rajesh Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Kartikeya Saran Hon'ble Shekhar B. Saraf,J. Hon'ble Dr. Yogendra Kumar Srivastava,J. 1. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties. 2. Upon perusal of the documents available on record and after hearing counsel appearing on behalf of the parties, it appears that an alternative remedy of filing an appeal under Section 127 of the Electricity Act, 2003 is available to the petitioner. Accordingly, we do not deem it fit to interfere in this matter. 3. The writ petition is disposed of with liberty granted to the petitioner to file an appeal before the appropriate authority within a period of two weeks from date. In the event such an appeal is filed, the authority concerned is directed to hear and decide the said appeal in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within a period of twelve weeks from the date such an appeal is filed. Order Date :- 13.5.2025 Kuldeep (Dr. Y.K. Srivastava, J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf, J.) Digitally signed by :- KULDEEP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad