- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:43395 WP No. 5214 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 5214 OF 2024 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: MR. MUTHU RAMAN, S/O MADHURAI, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, R/AT NO.18, 1ST CROSS, SUBRAMANI LAYOUT, RAMAMURTHY NAGAR, BANGALORE 560 016. …PETITIONER (BY SRI BABU MANUEL ABEL, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, THE DEPARTMENT OF STAMPS AND REGISTRATION, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, VIDHANA SOUDHA, DR. AMBDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU 01. 2. THE INSPECTOR GENERAL OF STAMPS AND REGISTRATION, KANDAYA BHAVAN, 8TH FLOOR, AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BANGALORE 560009. 3. THE DEPUTY REGISTRAR, INFANTRY ROAD, SHIVAJI NAGAR, BANGALORE 560 032. 4. THE SENIOR SUB REGISTRAR, BANASWADI SUB REGISTRAR OFFICE NO.740/2, BMP KHATA NO.25, 1ST FLOOR, 9TH B MAIN ROAD, HRBR LAYOUT, 1ST BLOCK, Digitally signed by SHWETHA RAGHAVENDRA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:43395 WP No. 5214 of 2024 KALYANAGAR, BANGALORE 560043. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. SARITHA KULKARNI, AGA FOR R-1 & R-4) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO-DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS TO MAKE AN ENTRY IN BOOK 1 THAT, THE SALE DEEDS EXECUTED IN FAVOR OF NANDAGOPAL AND PURSUANT SALE DEED EXECUTED IN FAVOUR OF AUSHA KHANUM AND FURTHER EXECUTION OF THE MEMORANDUM OF DEPOSIT OF TITLE DEED IN FAVOR OF CANARA BANK ARE FRAUDULENT DOCUMENTS AND NOT VALID IN LAW, BASED ON THE ENDORSEMENT ISSUED BY THE R2, WHICH IS PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-A TO THE WRIT PETITION. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ ORAL ORDER 1. The Petitioner are before this Court seeking for the following reliefs; 1) " Direct the Respondents to make an entry in Book 1 that, the sale deeds executed in favor of Nandagopal and pursuant sale deed executed in favor of Ausha Khanum and further execution of the Memorandum of Deposit of Title Deed in favor of Canara Bank are fraudulent documents and not valid in law, based on the endorsement issued by the Respondent No. 2, which is produced at Annexure-A to the writ petition. 2) Pass such other relief as the facts and circumstances of the case may deal fit in the interest of justice and equity." 2. The contention of the Petitioner is that certain persons have impersonated and got a sale deed executed, in - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:43395 WP No. 5214 of 2024 furtherance of which the Petitioner wanted an entry to be made in the encumbrance certificate in relation thereto. 3. On enquiry, learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that the Petitioner has filed a suit before the trial Court. 4. Reserving liberty to the Petitioner to agitate all contentions before the said Court, the petition stands disposed. SD/- (SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) JUDGE KTY List No.: 1 Sl No.: 42