IN T 111 Bhushan J Chander Panchkula CORAM: Present:- NIDHI GU of order dat this Court Haryana an :- COCP-4486-2025 (O & M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJA AT CHANDIGAR COCP No.4486 o Date of decision : shan Janjua and others Versus der Shekhar Khare, Chief Adm hkula and another AM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NID Mr. Kanwar Abhay Singh, Adv for the petitioners. Mr. Nitin Gupta, Advocate for Mr. Harmanjot Singh Gill, Adv for the respondents. I GUPTA J. (Oral) Present contempt petition has b der dated 14.2.2022 (Annexure P-1) pa Court in CWP-20384-2021 titled as “P ana and others”, the operative part of w “….Keeping in view of a and the interest of the being given in this case in the State of Haryana any coercive steps as th out plan for depositing and the reference compensation as per the Learned counsel for 1 UNJAB AND HARYANA IGARH 4486 of 2025 (O & M) ision :-22.01.2026 …..Petitioners Administrator of the HSVP, …..Respondents NIDHI GUPTA h, Advocate te for Advocate n has been filed alleging violation 1) passed by a Division Bench of as “Pradeep Kumar vs. State of rt of which is reproduced as below of above detailed proposed plan the land owners, a direction is ase that all the executing courts yana are restrained from taking as the respondents have carved iting the compensation amount ce courts will accept the r the above said proposed plan. for respondent-HSVP further VIJAY ASIJA 2026.01.27 10.15 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document submits tha Court. Lea 05.09.2025 No.3601 of Khare, IAS circumstanc 14.02.2022 is taken on petitioners the petition contempt pe COCP No.3 COCP-4486-2025 (O & M) informs that due publ respect to proposed plan in the entire State of H can be awared with compensation as per the A direction is bei to comply and make the the above said proposed At the very outset, learned c its that the petitioners herein were n t. Learned counsel further places reli .2025 passed by a co-ordinate Benc 601 of 2025 titled “Jagdish Singh and a IAS and others”, wherein a contem mstances, alleging violation of the sa .2022, was dismissed. Copy of the afor en on record. Learned counsel for the res oners in the present contempt petition st etitioners in COCP No.3601 of 2025 mpt petition also deserves to be dismisse Relevant extract of order da P No.3601 of 2025 is as follows :- “xxx xxx xxx 3. Learned counsel f that the petitioners here 20384-2021, nor did the further submitted tha disposed of as rendere dated 02.05.2024, as the 2 publication will be done with plan of depositing compensation of Haryana so that land owners with respect to deposit of r the schedule stated above. being given to the respondents the payment in accordance with osed plan/priority list….” rned counsel for the respondents were not parties before the Writ es reliance upon the order dated Bench of this Court in COCP nd another vs. Chander Shekhar contempt petition filed in similar the same Writ Court order dated he aforesaid order dated 05.9.2025 e respondents submits that the tition stand on identical footing as 2025 and, therefore, the present ismissed on the same terms. er dated 05.9.2025 in identical sel for the respondents contends herein were not parties to CWP- d they file any writ petition. It is that CWP-20384-2021 was ndered infructuous, vide order s the compensation amount was VIJAY ASIJA 2026.01.27 10.15 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document COCP-4486-2025 (O & M) disbursed to the land lo contends that some per dated 14.02.2022 pas before Hon'ble the Su No.4832 of 2022, which dated 31.10.2023. 4. The relevant po 31.10.2023 passed by H SLP (C) No.4832 of 2022 "In so far loosers, where t made, we clarify t the High Court 14.02.2022 to p shall stand vacate be entitled to including executio of the amount. In cases proceedings have earlier order pas decree holder w seeking revival of be considered by matter shall b accordance with l Needless t loosers are still a for receiving the the land which h executing courts where the procee shall keep in vie and proceed with as possible. In so far a which are said concerned will no proceed in accord With the petitions stand d pending applicatio 5. A perusal of th petitioners herein were 2021 and the said writ 3 nd losers concerned. He further persons challenged the order passed in CWP-20384-2021 Supreme Court in SLP (C) hich was disposed of vide order t portion of the order dated y Hon'ble the Supreme Court in 2022 is reproduced as under:- far as the remaining land- re the payment has not been rify that the restraint imposed by ourt through the order dated o proceed with the execution acated and the land-loosers will to initiate such proceedings cution proceedings for recovery ases where the execution have been closed in view of the r passed by the High Court, the r would have the liberty of al of such petitions, which shall by the executing court and the l be proceeded further in ith law. ss to mention since the land- till agitating their rights to seek the compensation in respect of ch have been lost by them, the urts as well as the other courts roceedings have been initiated, view this aspect of the matter with the matters as expeditiously ar as the contempt proceedings aid to be pending, the Courts ll now take note of the same and cordance with law. the above clarification, the d disposed of along with the ication(s), if any.” f the record shows that the ere not party in CWP-20384- writ petition was disposed of as VIJAY ASIJA 2026.01.27 10.15 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document case file as Bench in C is of the vie in terms of 2025, as le present case January 22 Vijay Asija Whether spe Whether Rep COCP-4486-2025 (O & M) rendered infructuous, s was delivered to the l restraint imposed by th 14.02.2022 in CWP-203 execution stood vacated held entitled to initiate execution proceedings fo 6. In view of the abo made out. Consequent dismissed.” I have heard learned counsel fo file as well as the order dated 05.09.202 h in COCP No.3601 of 2025. Upon su the view that the present contempt petit rms of the order dated 05.09.2025 pa , as learned counsel for the petitioners nt case. Ordered accordingly. Rule stands discharged. Pending application(s), if any, sh 2, 2026 Asija er speaking/reasoned Yes / No er Reportable Yes / No 4 s, since compensation amount he land losers concerned. The y this Court vide order dated 20384-2021 to proceed with the cated and the land losers were iate such proceedings including gs for recovery of the amount. e above, no case for contempt is uently, the present petition is nsel for the parties and perused the .09.2025 passed by the co-ordinate pon such consideration, this Court t petition is liable to be dismissed passed in COCP No.3601 of ioners is unable to distinguish the any, shall stand disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE VIJAY ASIJA 2026.01.27 10.15 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document