ML 16.01.2025 85 Ct. No.10 Sws.M W.P.A. 29512 of 2024 Ranajit Purkait Vs. The State of West Bengal & Ors. Mr. Koyeli Bhattacharyya Ms. Saswati Chatterjee Mr. Bibek Dutta ….for the petitioner Mr. Mekhla Sinha Ms. Malabika Roy Dey …for the Howrah Zilla Parishad Affidavit-of-Service filed in Court today be kept with the records. The grievance of the petitioner is directed against non-consideration of a representation dated 25 September, 2024. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that without obtaining any lawful permission or sanction, the private-respondents have caused unauthorised construction. The Howrah Zilla Parishad is represented and submits that they have no objection if the representation dated 25 September, 2024 is decided by the concerned Pradhan being the respondent No. 10 in accordance with law. In view of the submissions made on behalf of the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, WPA 29512 of 2024 stands disposed of by directing the Pradhan, being the respondent No. 10 to consider the representation dated 25 September, 2024, after giving a right of 2 hearing to all the affected parties, in accordance with law and without being influenced by any observation made in this order. It is made clear that there has been no expression on the merits of the case and the respondent No. 10 is to act strictly in accordance with law and conclude the above exercise within 6 (six) weeks from the date of communication of this order. However, there shall be no order as to costs. Since affidavits have not been invited, the allegations made in the writ petition are deemed not to have been admitted. Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be made available to the parties upon compliance of necessary formalities. (Ravi Krishan Kapur, J.)