BRIJRAJ SINGH S/O SHRI JAIPAAL SINGH v. SMT. PUNAM
CCP/747/2024 · 2025-11-19
Shubha Mehta, Sudesh Bansal
Contempt Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 48645 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 48645 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:46686-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 747/2024
In D.B. Civil Special Appeal (Writ) No. 663/2015 Brijraj Singh S/o Shri Jaipaal Singh, Aged About 72 Years, R/o Village And Post Mohammedpur, Jadaun, District Gautambudh Nagar, (Grater Noida). ----Petitioner Versus
1. Smt. Punam, Sanskrit Education, Department Of Sanskrit Education, Government Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan.
2. Shri Vijaypal Singh, Director Sanskrit Education, Department Of Sanskrit Education Shiksha Shankul, Jawahar Lal Nehru Marg, Jaipur, Rajasthan.
3. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Secretariat, Department Of Sanskrit Education, Government Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. D.P. Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manoj Kumar Ms. Pooja Dixit for Mr. G.S. Gill, AAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SHUBHA MEHTA
Order 19/11/2025 It has been pointed out that on the similar set of facts, vide
order dated 11.11.2025 passed in D.B. Civil Contempt Petition No.597/2025, involving the contempt of order dated 01.12.2021, following order was passed by the Division Bench of this High Court with the consent of counsel for the respective parties:-
[2025:RJ-JP:46686-DB] (2 of 2) [CCP-747/2024]
“This civil contempt petition is disposed of in following termsas agreed and requested by the learned counsels for there spective parties:-
1. In view of Division Bench judgment dated21.08.2025 passed by this Court in D.B.Civil Contempt
Petition
No.1666/2018:Dr.
Anil KumarMathur & Ors. Versus Mr. Ashutosh A.T. Pednekar & Ors. and other connected matters, this civil contempt petition is dismissed.
2. However, rights and liabilities of the parties in the subject-matter of dispute shall remain subject to the decision of the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in Special Leave to Petition preferred against the aforesaid
judgment. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed off.” In view of the above, this contempt petition also stands
disposed of in terms of the order dated 11.11.2025. Notices stand discharged. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of.
(SHUBHA MEHTA),J (SUDESH BANSAL),J pcg/25