- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:25041 RSA No. 1812 of 2018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 1812 OF 2018 (INJ) BETWEEN: SMT B R RENUKAMMA W/O LATE VIJAYAKUMAR AGE 60 YEARS R/AT INDIRNAGAR KENCHANAKUPPE VILLAGE BIDADI HOBLI RAMANAGARA TALUK – 581 453 …APPELLANT [BY SMT. MANJULADEVI R KAMADALLI, ADVOCATE (ABSENT)] AND: 1. SMT L N GAYATHRI DEVI D/O NANJAIAH AGE 39 YEARS 2. SMT. NARAYANAMMA W/O NANJAIAH AGED 63 YEARS 3. NANJAPPA @ NANJAIAH S/O NANJAIAH @ VENKATABOVI AGED 65 YEARS, 4. L N NANDEESH KUMAR S/O NANJAIAH AGED 40 YEARS, Digitally signed by SUNITHA K S Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:25041 RSA No. 1812 of 2018 5. L N RAVIKUMAR S/O NANJAIAH AGED 35 YEARS, ALL ARE R/O JANATHA COLONY KENCHANAKUPPE VILLAGE BIDADI HOBLI RAMANAGARA TLAUK - 581 453. …RESPONDENTS THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SEC.100 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 06.02.2018 PASSED IN RA NO.62/2013 ON THE FILE OF THE ADDL.SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, RAMANAGARA, ALLOWING THE APPEAL AND SETTING ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 19.01.2013 PASSED IN OS NO.264/2007 ON THE FILE OF THE ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC., RAMANAGARA. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI ORAL JUDGMENT The appeal is filed in 2018. Despite granting sufficient opportunity, appellant has not taken steps. 2. Matter was listed on 21.04.2025. None appeared for the appellant on the last date of hearing. This Court had passed the following order: “Appeal is filed in 2018. Despite granting sufficient opportunity, appellant has not taken steps. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:25041 RSA No. 1812 of 2018 The matter was listed on 22.03.2025, at the request of learned counsel for the appellant finally a week’s time was granted to take steps, failing which, the appeal shall be listed for dismissal. Even today, case called twice, none appears for the appellant. From the perusal of the order sheet it disclose that appellant is not interested in taking steps. However, to meet the ends of justice, finally two weeks time is granted to take steps, subject to the payment of cost of Rs.2,000/- payable to the Advocates Association, Bengaluru, failing which, the appeal shall be listed for dismissal after Summer Vacation -2025.” 3. Case called today. 4. None appears for the appellant. 5. It shows that the appellant is not interested in taking steps. In view of the peremptory order, I do not find any grounds to grant further time for taking steps and also the appellant has not deposited the cost as ordered by this Court vide order dated 21.04.2025 Accordingly, the appeal stands dismissed for not taking steps. - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:25041 RSA No. 1812 of 2018 In view of the dismissal, I.A.No.1/2018 does not survive for consideration. Accordingly, disposed of. Sd/- (ASHOK S.KINAGI) JUDGE BVK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 40