IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT 947 Pirthi Pal Singh State of Punjab and others CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Present: None Ms. Shruti, AAG, Punjab *** AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (Oral) 1. Prayer made in the present petition for quashing (Annexure P8) rejecting the request which might not be surviving due to efflux of time. 2. Learned State counsel refers to para 1 of the prelimi to state that self employment leave to go abroad was sanctioned to the from 04.08.200 which could not be curtailed before expiry of 3 years and consequently of Personnel D order. 3. D case lis still subsists. 01.05.2025 ashok Whether speaking/reasoned : Whether reportable : IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-5248 Date of decision: ingh Versus State of Punjab and others HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY None for the petitioner. Ms. Shruti, AAG, Punjab. *** AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (Oral) Prayer made in the present petition for quashing (Annexure P8) rejecting the request for allowing to join the petitioner on which might not be surviving due to efflux of time. Learned State counsel refers to para 1 of the prelimi to state that self employment leave to go abroad was sanctioned to the from 04.08.2004 to 03.08.2009 as per Government Instructions dated 08.05.2002 which could not be curtailed before expiry of 3 years and consequently Department, request of the petitioner was Disposed of reserving the petitioner with a liberty to get it revived in still subsists. ( AMAN CHAUDHARY ) Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 5248-2006 (O&M) Date of decision: 01.05.2025 ..Petitioner ..Respondents HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Prayer made in the present petition for quashing (Annexure P8) the petitioner on duty w.e.f 08.07.2005 which might not be surviving due to efflux of time. Learned State counsel refers to para 1 of the preliminary submission to state that self employment leave to go abroad was sanctioned to the petitoner 03.08.2009 as per Government Instructions dated 08.05.2002 which could not be curtailed before expiry of 3 years and consequently, on advice request of the petitioner was rejected vide impugned isposed of reserving the petitioner with a liberty to get it revived in ( AMAN CHAUDHARY ) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No Prayer made in the present petition for quashing (Annexure P8) duty w.e.f 08.07.2005 nary submission petitoner 03.08.2009 as per Government Instructions dated 08.05.2002 on advice vide impugned isposed of reserving the petitioner with a liberty to get it revived in ASHOK KUMAR 2025.05.02 13:40 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document