IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.48798 of 2025 In CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.3703 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-26 Year-2020 Thana- SAKRI District- Madhubani ====================================================== 1. MUNGA LAL SAHNI S/o- Late Chunki Sahni Village- Mohmmadpur Ps- Sakri Dist- Madhubani 2. Narayan Sahni S/o- Munge Lal Sahni Village- Mohmmadpur Ps- Sakri Dist- Madhubani 3. Debu Sahni S/o- Munge Lal Sahni Village- Mohmmadpur Ps- Sakri Dist- Madhubani 4. Phool Kumari W/o- Munge Lal Sahni Village- Mohmmadpur Ps- Sakri Dist- Madhubani 5. Rubi Devi W/o- Debu Sahni Village- Mohmmadpur Ps- Sakri Dist- Madhubani 6. Baby Devi @ Babita Devi W/o- Narayan Sahni Village- Mohmmadpur Ps- Sakri Dist- Madhubani ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar 2. Sulekha Devi W/o- Laxman Sahni Village- Mohmmadpur Ps- SAkri Dist- Madhubani ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioners : Mr. Rajesh Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the State : Ms. Renu Kumari, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 14-08-2025 Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. appearing for the State. 2. This application has been filed for restoration of Cr. App. (SJ) No. 3703 of 2025, which stood dismissed on 04.01.2023 due to non-compliance of peremptory order dated 07.12.2022. By the said order, four weeks’ peremptory time was Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.48798 of 2025(2) dt.14-08-2025 2/2 granted to learned counsel appearing for the appellants to remove the defect(s), as pointed out by the stamp reported, but it was not complied within stipulated time. 3. From bare perusal of the instant restoration application, it is apparent that the same has been filed after inordinate delay of more than one year and four months on 20.05.2025 for restoration of the appeal which stood dismissed on 04.01.2023 and there is no plausible explanation for the same. 4. In view of the facts and circumstances of the case and inordinate delay in filing of the present restoration application, this restoration application is dismissed. shashank/- (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) U T