Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 48637 (AP)

P. Madhusudhan Reddy v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/6125/2022 · 2025-09-21

V Sujatha

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010101912022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH MONDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA WRIT PETITION NO: 6125/2022 Between: 1. P. MADHUSUDHAN REDDY, S/O. RAMI REDDY AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, OCC. CONTRACTOR, R/O.4 ATMAKURU, KURNOOL DISTRICT, PIN CODE. 518 523. 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS SPECIAL CHIEF SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF IRRIGATION (WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT), SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE AND PLANNING, SECRETARIAT BUILDIN DISTRICT. 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT ENGINEER, IRRIGATION CIRCLE, KURNOOL, KUNROOL DISTRICT. 4. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, W.R.DEPT., M.I. WORKS DIVISION, NANDYAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 5. THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, AP CFMS C-BLOCK, ANJANEYA TOWERS, IBRAHIMPATNAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA WRIT PETITION NO: 6125/2022 P. MADHUSUDHAN REDDY, S/O. RAMI REDDY AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, OCC. CONTRACTOR, R/O.4-85, KOMATIBAJAR, BANDI ATMAKURU, KURNOOL DISTRICT, PIN CODE. 518 523. ...PETITIONER AND THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS SPECIAL CHIEF SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF IRRIGATION (WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT), SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE AND PLANNING, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR THE SUPERINTENDENT ENGINEER, IRRIGATION CIRCLE, KURNOOL, KUNROOL DISTRICT. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, W.R.DEPT., M.I. WORKS DIVISION, NANDYAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, AP CFMS OFFICE, 6TH FLOOR, BLOCK, ANJANEYA TOWERS, IBRAHIMPATNAM, KRISHNA ...RESPONDENT(S): IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3333] THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF SEPTEMBER THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA P. MADHUSUDHAN REDDY, S/O. RAMI REDDY AGED ABOUT 36 85, KOMATIBAJAR, BANDI ATMAKURU, KURNOOL DISTRICT, PIN CODE. 518 523. ...PETITIONER THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS SPECIAL CHIEF SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF IRRIGATION (WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT), SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE AND PLANNING, GS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR THE SUPERINTENDENT ENGINEER, IRRIGATION CIRCLE, THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, W.R.DEPT., M.I. WORKS DIVISION, OFFICE, 6TH FLOOR, BLOCK, ANJANEYA TOWERS, IBRAHIMPATNAM, KRISHNA ...RESPONDENT(S): 2 VS,J W.P.No.6125 of 2022 Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ or direction declaring the action of the Respondents in withholding the payment of net balance amount Rs.7,52,922/- vide CFMS ID number 2019-286408, even after finalizing the bills, payable to the petitioner in relation to the works i.e., Formation of Ayacut road of Santhajuturu Varadhi to Ramapuram from Ch. 3.00 to km 4.500 near Santhajuturu(V) in Bandi Atmakur (M) Kurnool (Dt) under Neeru Chettu Programme, vide Agreement No.1558/2018-19, dated 02.06.2018 is questioned, as the same is illegal, arbitrary and consequently direct the respondents to consider for payment of amounts of Rs.7,52,922/- vide CFMS ID number 2019-286408 with interest @24 percent per annum for the delayed amount to the petitioner in respect of execution of above- mentioned work forthwith and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2022 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to consider for payment of amount of Rs.7,52,922/- vide CFMS ID number 2019-286408 with interest @24% per annum for the delayed amount to the petitioner in respect of execution of works i.e. "Formation of Ayacut road of Santhajuturu Varadhi to Ramapuram from Ch. 3.00 to km 4.500 near Santhajuturu(V) in Bandi Atmakur (M) Kurnool (Dt) under Neeru Chettu Programme", vide Agreement No.1558/2018-19, dated 02.06.2018, forthwith, pending disposal of the Writ Petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. BATHALA RAMESH Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR FINANCE PLANNING 2. GP FOR IRRIGATION COMM AREA DEV 3 VS,J W.P.No.6125 of 2022 The Court made the following Order: The present Writ Petition came to be filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following relief:- “… to issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ or direction declaring the action of the Respondents in withholding the payment of net balance amount Rs.7,52,922/- vide CFMS ID number 2019-286408, even after finalizing the bills payable to the petitioner in relation to the works i.e., Formation of Ayacut road of Santhajuturu Varadhi to Ramapuram from Ch. 3.00 to km 4.500 near Santhajuturu(V) in Bandi Atmakur (M) Kurnool (Dt) under Neeru Chettu Programme”, vide Agreement No.1558/2018-19 dated 02.06.2018 is questioned, as the same is illegal, arbitrary and consequently direct the respondents to consider for payment of amounts of Rs.7,52,922/- vide CFMS ID number 2019-286408 with interest @24% per annum for the delayed amount to the petitioner in respect of execution of above-mentioned work forthwith and to pass such other order or orders ….” 2. When the writ petition came up for admission on 10.03.2022, this Court was pleased to pass the following interim direction in I.A.No.1 of 2022: “In the circumstances, the respondents are directed to pay the approved and final bill amount due to the petitioner within a period of six (6) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.” 3. Today, when the writ petition came up for hearing, Ms. M.Sumalatha, learned counsel representing Mr. Bathala Ramesh, learned counsel for the petitioner has stated that, pending writ petition, the respondent authorities have paid the amounts due to the petitioner. 4. Recording the same, this Writ Petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. 4 VS,J W.P.No.6125 of 2022 As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed __________________ JUSTICE V.SUJATHA Dated: 22.09.2025 MDP