SUNIL SHARMA @ BABU KABADI S/O SHIVNARAYAN v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/12906/2025 · 2025-11-17
Pramil Kumar Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 48630 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 48630 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:46142] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 12906/2025 Sunil Sharma @ Babu Kabadi S/o Shivnarayan, R/o Makan Number 68 Competition Colony, Police Station Mahaveer Nagar, Kota City, Kota (Raj.) (At Present Lodge At District Jail Kota) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sudarshan Laddha Mr. Naman Jain For Respondent(s) For Complainant : : Mr. Naresh Kumar Gupta, PP Mr. Avinash Dhanju Mr. Jitin HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR
Order 17/11/2025
1. The petitioner has preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.55/2025 registered at Police Station R.K. Puram, District-Kota City for offences under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 324(5), 109(1) and 3(5) of BNS.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Public Prosecutor and counsel for the complainant and perused the material available on record.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that the injury sustained by the injured-Kishan Kumar is simple in nature and another injured-Akshay, only one injury on the left knee is grievous in nature while all remaining injuries are simple. There is no medical opinion by which any injury can be termed as
[2025:RJ-JP:46142] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-12906/2025] a dangerous to life. Though there are 15 cases pending against the petitioner in 10 cases he has been acquitted and in remaining cases he has been bailed out. Petitioner is behind the bars since
15.09.2025. Charge-sheet has been filed. The trial of the case may take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in further custody, hence, the bail application of the petitioner may be allowed.
4. Learned Public Prosecutor and counsel for the complainant have vehemently opposed the bail application.
5. On consideration of the rival submission and material available on record and deliberating all the facts and circumstances of the case, but without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner.
6. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is ordered that the petitioner-Sunil Sharma @ Babu Kabadi S/o Shivnarayan shall be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court for his appearance before that Court on all the dates till conclusion of the trial.
(PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Arun/112