Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 48628 (AP)

M/S STANCH PROJECT PVT LTD v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/24044/2025 · 2025-09-22

Gannamaneni Ramakrishna Prasad

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010471002025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3328] TUESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO: 24044/2025 Between: 1. M/S STANCH PROJECT PVT LTD, REP. BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER YERRA BALACHAND, S/O.Y SITARAMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, OCC CONTRACTOR, R/O. H.NO.7-1-636/2, MODEL COLONY, ERRAGADDA, HYDERABAD, PINCODE 500038. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE AND PLANNING, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR OF ANDHRA PRADESH, EDUCATION AND WELFARE INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION (APEWIDC), VADDESWARAM, TADEPALLI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. THE CHIEF ENGINEER APEWIDC, VADDESWARAM, TADEPALLI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 4. THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, APEWIDC CIRCLE, KADAPA, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. 5. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, APEWIDC DIVISION, CHITTOOR, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 2 6. THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER APCFSS, 3RD FLOOR, NIDHI BHAVAN, BEHIND APIIC BUILDING, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, PINCODE 522503. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. MODAPOTHULA SUMALATHA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR FINANCE PLANNING 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO: 24044 of 2025 The Court made the following Oral Order: Heard Ms. M.Sumalatha, learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioner and Sri Radha Krishna Lankisetti, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of Sri V.Ch.Naidu, learned Standing Counsel for Respondent Nos.2 to 5. 2. Sri Radha Krishna Lankisetti, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of Sri V.Ch.Naidu, learned Standing Counsel for Respondent Nos.2 to 5 has submitted Written Instructions furnished by the Executive Officer APEWIDC Division, Chittoor dated 09.09.2025. Copy of it is also supplied to the Counsel for the Petitioner. The same is taken on record. Written Instructions would indicate that the Administrative Department has uploaded the Bill on the CFMS Portal. 3. Having regard to the facts and circumstances, this Court deems it appropriate to allow the Writ Petition directing the Respondent No.1 to complete the entire administrative process, within a period of eight (08) weeks, by way of mutual cooperation and coordination between the Departments and transfer the net amount to the Bank Account of the Writ Petitioner, within a period of twelve (12) weeks from today. Writ Petitioner is directed to furnish the Bank Account details to the Respondent Authorities forthwith, for effective compliance. 4. With these observations and directions, this Writ Petition stands allowed. No order as to costs. 4 5. Interlocutory applications, if any, pending shall stand closed. ______________________________________ GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD, J Dated: 23.09.2025 PSA 5 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO: 24044 of 2025 Date: 23.09.2025 PSA