Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:75761 Court No. - 50 Case :- WRIT - B No. - 1554 of 2025 Petitioner :- Smt. Sumitra Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 7 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ajay Kumar Dwivedi,Brajesh Shukla Counsel for Respondent :- Ayub Khan,C.S.C. Hon'ble Chandra Kumar Rai,J.
1. Heard Mr. Brajesh Shukla, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Ayub Khan, learned counsel for respondent no.3, Mr. Vindhya Vashini Rai, learned counsel for respondent no.9 and Sri Kumar Gaurav, learned standing counsel for the state-respondents. 2. The instant writ petition has been filed for the following relief:-
"Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus, directing respondent no.2/Deputy Director of Consolidation, Baghpat, to decide the Revision/Case No.0141 of 2023 (Computer Case No.20235411800000141) (Sumitra vs. Ramveer), under Section 41(1) of the U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1953."
3. Counsel for the petitioner submitted that chak revision filed by the petitioner is pending before respondent no.2/Deputy Director of Consolidation, as such, appropriate direction be issued for the expeditious disposal of the aforementioned chak revision within a time-bound period. He also submitted that arguments have been concluded in the pending proceeding before respondent no.2. 4. On the other hand, Mr. Ayub Khan, learned counsel for respondent no.3, Mr. Vindhya Vashini Rai, learned counsel for respondent no.9 and the learned standing counsel for the state-respondents submitted that chak revision filed by the petitioner is pending but the private respondents have filed separate Writ B No.1567/2025, praying therein for transfer of the proceeding from the court of Deputy Director of Consolidation, Baghpat to any other court, as such, prayer made in the instant petition, should not be granted. 5. I have considered the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the parties and perused the records. 6. There is no dispute about the fact that chak revision filed by the petitioner is pending before respondent no.2. There is also no dispute about the fact that transfer application filed by the private respondents has been rejected by the District Deputy Director of Consolidation, recording finding that no ground is made out to transfer the proceeding. 7.
Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this petition is disposed of with the direction to respondent no.2/Deputy Director of Consolidation, Baghpat to decide the aforesaid chak revision to its logical conclusion, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of 6 weeks, from the date of production of a certified copy of this
order before the authority concerned, after affording proper opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned, in accordance with law.
Order Date :- 9.5.2025 C.Prakash Digitally signed by :- CHANDRA PRAKASH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad