Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 48626 (CHH)

SMT. CHHAYA DEVI v. SMT. SANAT BAI W/o Hirau ( Since Dead) Through Lrs.

SA/699/2018 · 2025-12-04

Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:59331 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR SA No. 699 of 2018 1 - Smt. Chhaya Devi Widow Of Gajendra Singh Aged About 79 Years Occupation Agriculturist, R/o Village Khairagarh, Tahsil Khairagarh, District Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh. ............Plaintiff, District : Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh ... Appellant(s) versus 1 - Smt. Sanat Bai W/o Hirau ( Since Dead) Through Lrs. Nil. 1.1 - 1 (A). Paltu S/o Hirau Aged About 40 Years R/o Mandalatola, Post Itar, Tahsil Khairagarh, District Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh., District : Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh 1.2 - 1 (B). Suklal S/o Hirau Aged About 38 Years R/o Mandalatola, Post Itar, Tahsil Khairagarh, District Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh., District : Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh 1.3 - 1 (C). Kumbhlal S/o Hirau Aged About 35 Years R/o Mandalatola, Post Itar, Tahsil Khairagarh, District Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh., District : Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh 2 - State of Chhattisgarh Through The Collector Korba, District Korba, Chhattisgarh., District : Korba, Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) For Appellant(s) : None For Respondent(s) : Mr. Kalpesh Ruparel, Panel Lawyer. Hon’ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, J. Judgment on Board 05/12/2025 1. None for the appellant in two rounds. ALOK SHARMA Digitally signed by ALOK SHARMA Date: 2025.12.10 17:32:28 +0530 2 2. It transpires from the order-sheet dated 17.09.2025 that no one appear on behalf of the appellant on that day also when the matter was called for hearing. Today also when the matter is called for hearing twice no one appears on behalf of the appellant and no representation is made. 3. In view of the above, the present second appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge Alok