[2025:RJ-JP:44245-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Special Appeal Writ No. 1222/2025 Aayush Narania S/o Malchand, Aged About 24 Years, R/o 12, Khatikon Ka Mohalla, Pratap Nagar, Sanganer, Jaipur, Proprietor M/s Bharat Meat Shop, Shop No. 3, Village Sukhpuriya, India Gate, Sanganer, Jaipur. ----Appellant Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principle Secretary, Urban Department And Housing, Food Building, Secretariat, Jaipur- 302005 (Rajasthan). 2. The District Collector And District Magistrate, Jaipur, Collectorate, Jaipur. 3. Commissioner, Nagar Nigam Greater, Jaipur. 4. Deputy Commissioner, Pashu Prabandhan, Nagar Nigam Greater, Jaipur. ----Respondents Connected with D.B. Special Appeal Writ No. 1223/2025 Mohammad Ashraf Qureshi S/o Abdul Rashid, Aged About 24 Years, Proprietor M/s Mohammad Meat Shop, R/o Shop No. 6, Village Sukhpuriya, India Gate, Sanganer, Jaipur. ----Appellant Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principle Secretary Urban Department And Housing, Food Building, Secretariat, Jaipur 302005 (Rajasthan) 2. The District Collector And District Magistrate, Jaipur, Collectorate Jaipur. 3. Commissioner, Nagar Nigam Greater, Jaipur. 4. Deputy Commissioner, Pashu Prabandhan, Nagar Nigam Greater, Jaipur. ----Respondents D.B. Special Appeal Writ No. 1226/2025 [2025:RJ-JP:44245-DB] (2 of 3) [SAW-1222/2025] Mohammad Wasim S/o Mohammad Idrish, Aged About 40 Years, Proprietor M/s M Z Chicken Suppliers, R/o Shop No. 4, Village Sukhpuriya, India Gate, Sanganer, Jaipur. ----Appellant Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary Urban Department And Housing, Food Building, Secretariat, Jaipur 302005 (Rajasthan) 2. The District Collector And District Magistrate, Jaipur, Collectorate Jaipur. 3. Commissioner, Nagar Nigam Greater, Jaipur. 4. Deputy Commissioner, Pashu Prabandhan, Nagar Nigam Greater, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Appellant(s) : Ms. Aradhana Swami, Adv. Mr. Naqvi Sehban Najib Sabiha, Adv. For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE MR. SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BALJINDER SINGH SANDHU Order 04/11/2025 Learned counsel for the appellants submits that apart from the arguments that the shop ought not to have been closed on account of the proximity with the temple, as the temple was not a public temple, learned counsel has also raised the submissions with regard to cancellation of license on the same account. However, learned Single Judge has not addressed the said aspects. Learned counsel further submits that she should be allowed to file a review petition. Liberty is granted to the appellants to file a review petition on the aforesaid aspects. [2025:RJ-JP:44245-DB] (3 of 3) [SAW-1222/2025] Accordingly, the present special appeals writ are dismissed as withdrawn at this stage with liberty, as prayed for. All pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of. (BALJINDER SINGH SANDHU),J (SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA),ACTING CJ HEENA/DIKSHA/14, 197 & 198