Page No.# 1/3 GAHC040008752024 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : IA(C)/212/2025 Tai Nikio Age: 55 Occupation : Address:Son of Late Tai Kami permanent resident of Village Peel PO and PS Sangram Kurung Kumey District Arunachal Pradesh 791118 and presently residing at Karsingsa Doimukh Papumpare District Arunachal Pradesh 791123 VERSUS Tadar Mangku Age: 55 Occupation : Address:Son of Late Tadar Tagam permanent resident of Village Langht Loth PO and PS Nyapin Kurung Kumey District Arunachal Pradesh 791118 and presently residing at Pachin Colony PO and PS Naharlagun Papumpare District Arunachal Pradesh 791110 ------------ Advocate for the applicant : P. K. Tiwari, Sr. Advocate; U. Pathak; Rinchin Ledo Thungon Advocate for opposite party: R. Biswas; D. J. Kapil; D Tadar Linked Case : Election Pet./7/2024 Page No.# 2/3 Tadar Mangku Son of Late Tadar Tagam, permanent resident of Village Langht Loth, PO and PS Nyapin, Kurung Kumey District, Arunachal Pradesh 791118 and presently residing at Pachin Colony, PO and PS Naharlagun, Papumpare District, Arunachal Pradesh 791110 VERSUS Tai Nikio Son of Late Tai Kami, permanent resident of Village Peel, PO and PS Sangram, Kurung Kumey District, Arunachal Pradesh 791118 and presently residing at Karsingsa, Doimukh, Papumpare District, Arunachal Pradesh 791123 Advocate for the Petitioner : D J Kapil, D Tadar,K Posi Advocate for the Respondent : Pritam Taffo, Tabing Lamgu,1 P K Tiwari, Sr. Advocate,Rinchin Ledo Thungon BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE ORDER Date : 28.08.2025 Heard Mr. P. K. Tiwari, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Mr. U. Pathak, learned counsel appearing for the applicant/respondent. Also heard Mr. R. Biswas and Mr. D. J. Kapil, learned counsel for the opposite party/election petitioner. 2. By filing this Interlocutory Application under Rule 93 of The Conduct of Election Rules, 1961, the applicant has prayed for allowing him to inspect documents and obtain copies thereof, as allowed to the opposite party/election petitioner, as mentioned in the order dated 19.05.2025, passed in IA(C) No. 54/(AP)2025. 3. Having heard the learned Senior Counsel for the applicant and prayer not being objected to by the learned counsel for the opposite party/election petitioner, I deem it appropriate to allow the applicant/respondent to inspect and obtain copies, thereof, to those documents/materials as mentioned in the order dated 19.05.2025, passed in Page No.# 3/3 IA(C) No. 54/(AP)2025, particularly- D, E, F, H, I, J, K, L, Q and U, in accordance with Rules as the same are covered by Rule 93(2)(a) & (b) of the Conduct of Election Rules, 1961. Accordingly, it is ordered. 4. The interlocutory application stands disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant