[2025:RJ-JP:49359] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No.7720/2025 Naresh Saini S/o Shri Omkarmal Saini, Aged About 24 Years, R/o Dhani Jalpala, Tan Gadrata, Police Station Khetri, Distt. Jhunjhunu (Rajasthan) ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp 2. Makkhanlal S/o Dhanna Ram, R/o Dhani Jalpala, Tan Gadrata, Police Station Khetri, Distt. Jhunjhunu (Rajasthan) 3. Jitendra S/o Ramjilal, R/o Dhani Jalpala, Tan Gadrata, Police Station Khetri, Distt. Jhunjhunu (Rajasthan) 4. Sumer Devi W/o Ramjilal, R/o Dhani Jalpala, Tan Gadrata, Police Station Khetri, Distt. Jhunjhunu (Rajasthan) 5. Rotash S/o Dhannaram, R/o Dhani Jalpala, Tan Gadrata, Police Station Khetri, Distt. Jhunjhunu (Rajasthan) 6. Smt. Munnidevi W/o Makkhanlal, R/o Dhani Jalpala, Tan Gadrata, Police Station Khetri, Distt. Jhunjhunu (Rajasthan) 7. Bhadarmal S/o Dhannaram, R/o Dhani Jalpala, Tan Gadrata, Police Station Khetri, Distt. Jhunjhunu (Rajasthan) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sunil Singodiya For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Punia, PP JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 04/12/2025 1. By way of filing this petition, a prayer has been made for issuing direction to the Trial Court to complete the proceedings of Criminal Case No.75/2021 expeditiously within time frame period. [2025:RJ-JP:49359] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-7720/2025] 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that a complaint under Sections 341, 323, 336, 451, 147 & 149 IPC was submitted by the petitioner against the accused-respondent on 19.01.2021, but in-spite of passing of considerable time, till date, the said complaint has not been decided. Learned counsel submits that pursuant to the aforesaid, an application was submitted for expeditious disposal of the complaint, but till date, no steps have been taken by the Court below to speed up the proceedings of the pending complaint. Even till date, the charges have not been framed against the accused-respondents, hence under these compelling circumstances, the petitioner has approached this Court seeking a direction for the Court below to expedite the trial of the complaint within a time frame. 3. In the considered opinion of this Court, such direction cannot be issued by this Court as per the directions issued by the Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of A.R. Antulay vs. R.S. Nayak and Anr. reported in 1992(1) SCC 225 and in the case of P. Rama Chandra Rao. Vs. State of Karnataka reported in 2022 (4) SCC 578. But looking to the fact that the said complaint lying is pending before the Court below since 2021, it is expected from the Trial Court to make all possible endeavours to decide the pending complaint expeditiously as early as possible. 4. With the aforesaid observations/directions, the instant criminal misc. petition stands disposed of. The stay application and all pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Karan/108