DR. HEMANT BARALA S/O BIRBAL BUNKAR v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CW/14711/2025 · 2025-10-06
Ashok Kumar Jain
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 48612 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 48612 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:40523] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 14711/2025
1. Dr. Hemant Barala S/o Birbal Bunkar, Aged About 29 Years, R/o 20 B, Tara Nagar, Jaipur, Rajasthan- 302012
2. Dr. Piyush Bantoliya S/o Shri Ramcharan Bantoliya, Aged About 28 Years, R/o C-616, Panchsheel Nagar, Makarwali Road, Ajmer, Rajasthan- 305001
3. Dr. Shailendra Kumar S/o Banshidhar Meena, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Village Balawas, Tehsil Paparda, District Dausa, Rajasthan. 4. Dr. Anshul Narnoliya D/o Mukesh Pan, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Near Jawahar School, Meghwalo Ka Mohalla, Bhinsar (Rural), Bikaner, Rajasthan- 334403. 5. Dr. Yash Kumar Bairwa S/o Hazari Lal Bairwa, Aged About 29 Years, R/o 21 Mikki Nagar, Saini Colony Extension, Kartarpura, Ajmer Road, Station Road, Jaipur, Rajasthan- 302006
6. Dr. Amit Meena S/o Seeta Ram Meena, Aged About 29 Years, R/o 10-A, Saraswati Nagar, Opposite Sector No. 6, Jaipur, Rajasthan- 302017 ----Petitioners Versus
1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Principal Secretary, Medical And Health Department, Govt. Secretariat, Rajasthan Govt. Jaipur. 2. The Director (Public Health), Directorate Of Medical, Health And Family Welfare Services, Swasthya Bhawan, C-Scheme, Jaipur - (Raj.) ----Respondents Connected With S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 4382/2024
1. Dr. Rahul Barwad S/o Ram Dayal Barwad, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Flat No. 206, Kalayan Jewels, Dmart Goner Road, Jagatpura, District Jaipur, Rajasthan. 2. Dr. Dhananjay Singh S/o Radha Krishan, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Sohali Buhana, District Jhunjhunu, Rajasthan -
333515. [2025:RJ-JP:40523] (2 of 5) [CW-14711/2025]
3. Dr. Akshay Chopra S/o Prahlad Narayan Chopra, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Chopra Farms House, Ganpatpura-I, Mansarovar, District Jaipur, Rajasthan. 4. Dr. Sajjan Singh S/o Indra Singh, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Amarsinghpura, Post Pilod, Tehsil Surajgarh, District Jhunjhunu, Rajasthan. 5. Dr. Ravi Prakash Saini S/o Babulal Saini, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Village Ajabpura, Village And Post Ajabpura, Tehsil Thanagazi, District Alwar, Rajasthan. 6. Dr. Ramesh Fildoliya S/o Ramniwas, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Dalelpura, Revasa, Tehsil Nawa, District Nagaur, Rajasthan. 7. Dr. Harendra Singh S/o Kalyan Singh, Aged About 27 Years, R/o C-17, Ranjeet Nagar, District Bharatpur, Rajasthan. 8. Dr. Akash S/o Harendra Singh, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Village Chitokhari, Post Dhanota, District Bharatpur, Rajasthan - 321303. 9. Dr. Abhishek S/o Shri Ram, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Village And Post Jaghina, District Bharatpur, Rajasthan. 10. Dr.
Divyanshu Nagora S/o Vijay Nagora, Aged About 29 Years, R/o 2007/7, 13 Quarters, Malosar Road, Pharganj, District Ajmer, Rajasthan. 11. Dr. Mukesh Kumar Balai So Jagdish Prasad, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Village Jijot, Tehsil Kuchaman City, District Nagaur, Rajasthan. 12. Dr. Pradeep Verma S/o Prahlad Singh, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Village Nimbaheri, Village And Post Gwalda, Tehsil Tapurara, District Kairthal, District Alwar, Rajasthan - 301707. 13. Dr. Rahul Pahadiya S/o Radheyshyam Pahadiya, Aged About 28 Years, R/o C-471, Nirman Nagar, District Jaipur, Rajasthan. 14. Dr. Ajay Kumar Saini S/o Roshan Lal Saini, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Narayanpur, District Kotputli Behror, Rajasthan. 15. Dr. Rohitash Nayak S/o Jagan Lal Nayak, Aged About 30 Years, R/o 3-E, Chotti Meera Chowi, Ssb Road, Street No. 4, Shriganganagar, Rajasthan. [2025:RJ-JP:40523] (3 of 5) [CW-14711/2025]
16. Dr. Ramkishan Saini S/o Raghunath Prasad G, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Village Kairpura, Dataramgarh, District Sikar, Rajasthan. 17. Dr. Abhay Gupta S/o Dinesh Kumar Gupta, Aged About 28 Years, R/o 80/368, Sector 8, Pratap Nagar, Sanganer, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 18. Dr. Sikander Singh Rathore S/o Amar Singh, Aged About 28 Years, R/o 97, Kailash Nagar, Gali No. 11, Jhotwara, Jaipur, Rajasthan- 302012. 19. Dr. Vishal Banjara S/o Umarao Banjara, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Plot No. 2, Balaji Vihar No. 15, Near Kedia Palace, Murlipura, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 20. Dr. Sunil Kumar S/o Mohan Lal Beniwal, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Ambedkar Nagar, Manoharpur, Shahpura, District Jaipur, Rajasthan. 21. Dr. Nazmuddin Mewafarosh S/o Shamsuddin Mewafarosh, Aged About 30 Years, R/o House No. 221, Behind Solanki Talkies , Shastri Nagar, District Bhilwara, Rajasthan. 22. Dr. Vishnu Kumar S/o Natthi Lal, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Village And Post Barso, District Bharatpur, Rajasthan. 23. Dr. Raksha Pathak D/o Vinod Pathak, Aged About 27 Years, R/o 2-J-24, Mahaveer Nagar Extension, District Kota, Rajasthan. 24. Dr. Kavita D/o Hetram, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Chak 7, Dwd, Village And Post Kanwani, Rawatsar, District Hanumangarh, Rajasthan.
25. Dr. Rohit Kumar S/o Devendra Kumar, Aged About 27 Years, R/o 72 Ep, Ward No.11, Sri Karanpur, Sriganganagar, Rajasthan. 26. Dr. Mandeep Singh S/o Raghuveer Singh, Aged About 25 Years, R/o 121, Surjeet Singh Colony, Sriganganagar, Rajasthan. 27. Dr. Aman Arya S/o Pradeep Kumar Arya, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Near Bayana Mod, Hotel Basant, Hindaun City, District Karauli, Rajasthan. 28. Dr. Abhishek Kumar Meghwal S/o Sher Singh, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Ward No.12, Mohalla, Kagdiwara, Tijara, Alwar, Rajasthan- 301411. [2025:RJ-JP:40523] (4 of 5) [CW-14711/2025]
29. Dr. Rahul Naraneewal S/o Rajendra Naraneewal, Aged About 32 Years, R/o 101-B, Kumbha Nagar, District Chittorgarh, Rajasthan - 312001. ----Petitioners Versus
1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Principal Secretary, Medical And Health Department, Govt. Secretariat, Rajasthan Govt. Jaipur. 2. The Director (Public Health), Directorate Of Medical, Health And Family Welfare Services, Swasthya Bhawan, C-Scheme, Jaipur - (Raj.). ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Shreyansh Dhariwal Mr. Nakul Bansal For Respondent(s) : Mr. Archit Bohra AGC HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN
Order 06/10/2025
1. These two writ petitions were filed with common prayer of posting in rural areas for a period of 3 years.
2. In writ petition No. 14711/2025, the petitioners have made following prayer:- i) the impugned actions of respondents of not granting posting to humble petitioners on the post of Medical Officers in Rural Area for the purpose of bonus marks for their admission in post-graduation may kindly be declared illegal and arbitrary and therefore, same may kindly be quashed and set aside. ii) by issuing the writ of mandamus, order or direction in the nature thereof respondents may kindly be directed to:- a) post humble petitioners in rural, difficult and remote areas' as defined under notification dated 14.04.2020 and subsequent notifications of Medical and Health Department as per the mandate of Rule 22-A of the Rajasthan Medical Service Rules, 1963; b) grant 10% bonus marks per year for admission in NEET- PG for the services rendered by humble petitioners in rural, difficult and remote areas.
3. In Writ Petition No. 4382/2024, following prayer is made:-
[2025:RJ-JP:40523] (5 of 5) [CW-14711/2025] (I) the impugned actions of respondents of not granting posting to humble petitioners on the post of Medical Officers in Rural Area for the purpose of bonus marks for their admission in post-graduation may kindly be declared illegal and arbitrary and therefore, same may kindly be quashed and set aside. (ii) by issuing the writ of mandamus, order or direction in the nature thereof respondents may kindly be directed to:- a) post humble petitioners in 'rural, difficult and remote areas' as defined under notification dated 14.04.2020 and subsequent notifications of Medical and Health Department as per the mandate of Rule 22- A of the Rajasthan Medical Service Rules, 1963; b) grant 10% bonus marks per year for admission in NEET-PG for the services rendered by
humble petitioners in rural, difficult and remote areas.
4.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondents Mr. Archit Bohra candidly admits that these writ petitions will be considered as a representation by the petitioners and the Department will pass an appropriate order as the Government is also facing difficulty in availability of Medical Officers to rural, remote and difficult areas.
5. Having considered the submission of learned counsels for the parties, these Writ Petitions are disposed of with direction to respondent(s) to consider these writ petitions as a representation on behalf of petitioners and consider and decide the same within a period of 30 days by a reasoned and speaking order.
6. If there is any grievance left to be addressed by the respondent(s), the petitioner(s) are free to approach this Court by filing a fresh petition.
7. Hence, instant writ petitions are disposed of with pending application(s), if any.
(ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J MONU /58-59