Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 4861 (GAU)

Bengia Talo v. The State of AP and 6 Ors

IA(C)/202/2024 · 2025-06-11

Budi Habung, Kardak Ete

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC040014412024 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : IA(C)/202/2024 Bengia Talo Son of Late Bengia Talum, Pappu Nallah, PO Naharlagun, PS Papu Hill, Papum Pare District, Arunachal Pradesh. VERSUS The State of AP and 6 Ors represented through the Chief Secretary, Govt. of Arunachal Pradesh, Itanagar. 2:The Deputy Commissioner cum Revenue Officer Age: 0 Occupation : Capital Complex Itanagar Govt of Arunachal Pradesh. 3:The Director of Land Management Age: 0 Occupation : Capital Complex Itanagar Govt of Arunachal Pradesh. 4:Aying Perme Age: 0 Occupation : Extra Assistant Commissioner Capital Complex Govt of Arunachal Pradesh. 5:The Art of Living Society Age: 0 Occupation : Jully Page No.# 2/3 Itanagar represented by Shri Brahmachar Ravider (Ashram in charge) PO and PS Itanagar Papum Pare District Arunachal Pradesh. 6:Nabam Tamar Age: 0 Occupation : Son of Late Nabam Talo Jullang Village PO and PS Itanagar Papum Pare District Arunachal Pradesh. 7:Smti Nabam Yaja Age: 0 Occupation : Wife of Late Nabam Talo Jullang Village PO and PS Itanagar Papum Pare District Arunachal Pradesh Advocate for the Petitioner : Michi Nibo, Advocate for the Respondent : GA (AP), BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BUDI HABUNG ORDER Date : 12-06-2025 Heard Mr. T. Katu, learned counsel for the applicant. Heard Mr. P. Sangeeta, learned Government Advocate for the opposite parties/respondents. This is an application praying for condonation of 3(three) days delay in filing the connected appeal being WA No.27(AP)/2025. Page No.# 3/3 Having considered the grounds put forth in the application and prayer not being objected to by the learned counsel for the respondents, we find the grounds to be germane and satisfied that sufficient cause is shown for delay of 3(three) days in filing the connected appeal. Accordingly, the delay of 3(three) days in filing the connected appeal is hereby condoned. Interlocutory application is allowed and disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant