Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 48603 (RAJ)

JAYBHAN SANGHI S/O SHRI RATAN LAL SANGHI v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/13321/2025 · 2025-10-15

Anoop Kumar Dhand

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:42137] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No.13321/2025 Jaybhan Sanghi S/o Shri Ratan Lal Sanghi, Aged About 59 Years, R/o House No. 112/2013 Pratap Nagar Housing Board, Sanganer, Jaipur (Raj.) (Accused Presently Confined In Central Jail, Jaipur). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. P.S. Rajawat For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Punia, Addl. GA-cum-PP JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 15/10/2025 1. The instant bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. has been filed by the petitioner in connection with the FIR No.278/2013 registered at Police Station Shastri Nagar, Jaipur (North) wherein he has been charged for the offences punishable under Sections 420, 406, 467, 468, 471, 120B IPC. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that an FIR was registered against the petitioner along-with other co-accused persons with the allegation that the co-accused Rajendra Kumar Sharma borrowed certain amount on the basis of certain fabricated documents, and the petitioner along-with other co- accused Mahesh Verma were guarantors of the aforesaid transaction. Learned counsel submits that the main accused- Rajendra Kumar Sharma and the guarantor-Mahesh Verma have already been granted indulgence of bail by the trial court. Learned counsel further submits that the petitioner has been in custody [2025:RJ-JP:42137] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-13321/2025] since the date of his arrest and trial will take its own time to conclude, therefore indulgence of bail be granted to the petitioner. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor opposes the bail application and submits that the petitioner was absconding and charge-sheet was submitted against him under Section 219 Cr.P.C, hence under these circumstances, the petitioner is not entitled to get indulgence of bail. 4 Heard and considered the submissions made at Bar and perused the material available on record. 5. Considering the arguments put forward by the learned counsel for the petitioner and looking to the fact that the main accused-Rajendra Kumar Sharma and other co-accused Mahesh Verma have already been granted indulgence of bail by the court below and the case of the petitioner is at par with them and also considering the fact that the petitioner has been in custody since the date of his arrest and trial will take its own time to conclude, without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, this Court deems it just and appropriate to grant indulgence of bail to the petitioner under Section 483 BNSS. 6. Accordingly, this bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner-Jaybhan Sanghi S/o Shri Ratan Lal Sanghi arrested in connection with aforementioned FIR, may be released on bail; provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- with two surety bonds of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court with the stipulation to appear before that Court on all dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Karan/216