IN TH 105 Anil Kuma Mr. Apoor CORAM: Present:- NIDHI GU violation o Division Kumar vs. was dismis a represen considered within a p representat forthwith.” COCP-2270-2025 (O & M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJA AT CHANDIGAR COCP No.2270 o Date of decision Kumar Versus Apoorva Kumar Singh, IAS and oth AM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NI Mr. G.S. Dhaliwal, Advocate f Mr. Surinder Dhull, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Ambika Luthra, Addl. A.G HI GUPTA J. (Oral) Present contempt petition tion of order dated 14.2.2023 (An Bench of this Court in CWP- ar vs. State of Haryana and others” dismissed as withdrawn and it was dir resentation is filed by the petiti ered by the competent authority an a period of eight weeks from the d entation. Decision, so taken, be ith.”. 1 UNJAB AND HARYANA IGARH 2270 of 2025 (O & M) cision :-30.03.2026 …..Petitioner nd others …..Respondents E NIDHI GUPTA ocate for vocate dl. A.G., Haryana. ition has been filed alleging (Annexure P-1) passed by a -28679-2022 titled as “Anil ”, whereby the writ petition as directed that “…In case, such etitioner, the same shall be y and a decision taken thereon the date of submission of such be conveyed to the petitioner VIJAY ASIJA 2026.04.01 17.34 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document in complia Order dated 19.12.2025 through the made by l required to the present March 30 Vijay Asija Whether spea Whether Repo COCP-2270-2025 (O & M) Learned counsel for the respo mpliance of the Writ Court order da r dated 13.6.2025 (Annexure R-1) has Order sheets shows that on t 2.2025, learned counsel for the peti gh the Short reply dated 28.11.2025 fi Today, none appears on behalf In view of the facts noted a by learned counsel for the respon ired to be passed in the present contem resent contempt petition is disposed o Rule stands discharged. Pending application(s), if any, 30, 2026 r speaking/reasoned Yes / No r Reportable Yes / No 2 respondent has pointed out that der dated 14.2.2023, a Speaking 1) has already been passed. t on the last date of hearing i.e. e petitioner sought time to go 025 filed by the respondents. behalf of petitioner. oted above and the submissions respondents, no further order is contempt petition. Accordingly, sed of. if any, shall stands disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE VIJAY ASIJA 2026.04.01 17.34 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document