296 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-48538-2018 (O&M) DATE OF DECISION : 07.07.2025 JAGROOP SINGH .......PETITIONER(s) VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS .....RESPONDENT(s) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MOUDGIL Present: None for the petitioner(s). Mr. Sandeep Singh, AAG, Punjab. *** SANDEEP MOUDGIL, J.(Oral) This petition has been filed under Section 482 of Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 with a prayer of directing the directing the respondent no. 1 to 4 to take appropriate legal action against respondent no. 5 who is trying and making an attempt to forcibly take away the Truck/vehicle of the petitioner bearing registration number (PB-46 W 8455) with the help of recovery agents and henchmen while it was running on road, despite the fact that the petitioner is regularly paying the loan amount, as this conduct of respondent no. 5 is against the mandate of constitutional bench of Apex court in "Citicorp Maruti Finance Ltd. v/s S Vijayalakhsmi 2012(1) SCC 1" and in "ICICI Bank Ltd. Vs Parkash Kaur and others (JT-2007(4) SC 39), and by Anuradha 2025.07.09 05:08 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-48538-2018 (O&M) 2 this Court in ‘Narinder Kumar Singla Vs State of Punjab (2006 (3) RCR 890), ‘M/s Sundaram Finance Ltd v/s Raj Kumar & others 2011 (4) RCR (Crl) 890. None has put in appearance on behalf of the petitioner since 25.04.2024. Today also there is no representation on his behalf. It seems that counsel for the petitioner is not interested in pursuing the matter. Hence, the petitioner stands dismissed for non- prosecution. (SANDEEP MOUDGIL) 07.07.2025 JUDGE anuradha Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No Anuradha 2025.07.09 05:08 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 297 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-39769-2024 (O&M) SOHAN LAL ALIAS SONU .......PETITIONER(s) VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS .....RESPONDENT(s) Present: Mr. Kashav Chadha, Advocate for the petitioner(s). Mr. B.S.Virk, Sr. DAG, Haryana. Mr. Rohit Kaushik, Advocate for respondent No. 5. *** Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks time to argue the matter. On his request, hearing of the case is deferred to 25.08.2025. Interim order to continue. (SANDEEP MOUDGIL) 07.07.2025 JUDGE anuradha Anuradha 2025.07.09 05:08 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document